Silicon Valley’s Biggest Payday. Yet!

The SpaceX cap table, what it is worth, and what happens next.


On June 12, a great many people become extraordinarily wealthy. Not one of them can sell a share until December — with one exception: up to five percent of the IPO shares are reserved for employees and executive-selected participants at the $135 offering price, with no lock-up. They can sell on day one.

This is the second piece in a series on the SpaceX IPO. Part one looked at Starlink, the cash engine behind the offering. .

What the latest S-1 reveals

The 555,555,555 shares being sold on listing day are new shares, issued by SpaceX. The $74.4 billion in proceeds goes to the company. No existing shareholder is selling anything. The full cap table is locked up for 180 days after listing.

Here is what it looks like at $135 per share.


The ownership table

Investor Est.


The Rocket That Runs on Broadband

SpaceX is in the business of rockets — how often they fly and what they do. The rest is imagination. The SpaceX IPO is a masterpiece of financial engineering. The prospectus is a perfect blend of reality, sci-fi, and skullduggery. I dug into the freshly filed 300-page IPO prospectus of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. to find out how much imagination is required.

SpaceX is seeking a valuation of $1.75 trillion, the largest IPO in American history, larger than anything Wall Street has previously been asked to absorb. In inflation-adjusted terms, SpaceX alone would rank second in history, just behind Saudi Aramco. SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic together would raise more money than the entire dot-com bubble from 1995 to 2000.

Financial analyst Paul Kedrosky has a warning about where the money comes from. Most of that money will come from existing holdings. Passive funds will be forced buyers the moment these


Meta’s Moment of Reckoning

Pop some popcorn. Put some butter. Add some salt. Because opportunists (politicians) are pointing their muskets at villains (tech bros), using children’s welfare as the ammunition. In case you were wondering, I am talking about the battle between New Mexico AG and Silicon Valley’s villain in chief.

The next bout is on May 4. So mark your calendars. Why?


This week two verdicts came in quick succession. First, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for knowingly enabling child predators on Instagram and Facebook. Then, a Los Angeles jury found Meta and YouTube negligent for designing platforms that addicted a young woman who first used YouTube at age six and Instagram at nine.

On the surface this is big win for ambulance chasers. However it could be much bigger if politicians actually have the best intentions that go beyond winning the next elections. History tells me, they


07.19.2025: The Weekend Edition

There are certain sweet-smelling, sugarcoated lies current in the world which all politic men have apparently tacitly conspired together to support and perpetuate. One of these is that there is such a thing in the world as independence: independence of thought, independence of opinion, independence of action. — Mark Twain


There are two books on the fall of Condé Nast: “Empire of the Elite” by Michael M. Grynbaum, a media reporter at The New York Times. It is good, juicy with details, but it feels like a chipotle dish. However, read Graydon Carter’s “When the Going Was Good” to get a full-on San Francisco-styled burrito experience. Carter is a much better storyteller, and his details have a level of first-person authenticity. Some of these good times were enjoyed by me at Forbes, but I am glad I escaped to the freedom accorded by Silicon Valley. Both these books are a


What kind of an engineer are you?

There are three kinds of engineers. 

A great financial engineer can turn anything into a $100 billion dollar company. And at the same time no longer be liable for any debt.  Having tasted success, a great financial engineer, of course attempts what they have done at a smaller scale, again. Of course, at a much larger scale. Let that sink in

Bonus Link: How to make your company be worth $100 Billion


Mute, Block, Breathe: How to deal with (un)Social Media

Scott Belsky, Adobe’s chief product officer, said something in a 2020 conversation that has stuck with me since.

“Twitter is one of those products where I can see overuse making people have a long term, problem with the product emotionally. And that’s being exacerbated in the day we’re living in now.”

You can extend this to almost all social media, which has become quite unsocial these days. I have been well aware of the rise of conflict culture for over half a decade. It has allowed me to prepare for the detrimental impact on social platforms for a while now. As result, I am better prepared to exert a modicum of control over what comes into my feeds. In addition to limiting my personal exposure to Twitter, Threads, and other social media to less than a couple of hours a week, I have created a series of rules for myself


How I Followed the Election Results

In the past, I typically followed election news and results on television networks like CNN and websites such as The New York Times. This time, I opted for Apple News’ Election Center coverage instead. It turned out to be good choice.

This approach significantly reduced the anxiety I experienced when watching live feeds on television networks or checking platforms like Twitter or Threads. Just as MSNBC and Fox are filter bubbles, so are Threads and Twitter. As someone who is acutely aware of the perils of “filter bubbles,” I make a good effort to limit my exposure to them to a few minutes a day. I did exactly the same when following the Election Day results.

By viewing one consolidated source, Apple News, unaffiliated with mainstream publications or television channels, helped filter out excessive and unnecessary commentary surrounding the elections and results. It was effective, consistently up-to-date, and visually clear


Our Unsocial Modern Times

water droplets on glass panel
Photo by Barefoot Communications on Unsplash

We live in a time of such confusion and rancor, with a culture that puts a premium on things that don’t last: money, fame, status, likes.

We chase the approval of strangers on our phones.

We build all manner of walls and fences around ourselves, and then we wonder why we feel so alone.

We don’t trust each other as much because we don’t take the time to know each other.

And in that space between us, politicians and algorithms teach us to caricature each other and troll each other and fear each other.

Barack ObamaPresident of the United States


For photos collages & crops, try Series

When I was looking to crop a landscape photo into a panorama, I discovered an app called Series. It’s a collage application that divides images for posting on Threads, Instagram’s microblogging platform. You can also use it to produce photos in sizes suitable for Twitter, Instagram, or other social media sites. 

On Threads, users can create a photo carousel. However, when images are precisely divided, users can reconstruct a complete wide-angle view that fills the screen. The panoramic effect becomes apparent as users move through the photos, producing a striking effect. Users can adjust the display to remove spaces between images and view the panorama without swiping in full-screen mode. 

Series is available in two versions — free or Pro, which costs $15 annually or approximately $3 monthly. The free version offers extensive functionality, so upgrading isn’t necessary. In my view, such single-purpose apps belong in the “pay once and forget” category and don’t warrant a subscription model, but I’m willing to support an independent developer. It’s also a tool for creating high-quality images for social media sharing. It’s exclusively available on iOS and iPadOS. 

The app is straightforward and user-friendly. Everything is clear — which is expected for a mobile app today. The one issue I have with the app is that it doesn’t guide users to begin anew easily. You see the previous photo at the top of the app, even after closing and reopening it. It took several attempts before I discovered that you can tap on the photo to select a