Skip to content

On my Om

On Technology & Change

  • Journal
  • Essays
  • Interviews
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search

Among the hardest things I have done in my life is to quit smoking. It has been over a decade since I last touched a cigarette, but I live with the effects of a 25-year habit, dealing with illnesses and issues that lead directly back to damage done by smoking. Perhaps that is why I am so outraged and angry about the vaping epidemic and the acceptance of Juul as a Silicon Valley company — when it is nothing more than a maker of cigarettes 2.0. The world is finally waking up to the insidious nature of Juul and all addictive substances. Even the president dislikes those guys enough to try and shut them down. 

But there is one demon I have not been able to conquer, an addiction that is worse than nicotine: consumerism. For the past four years, every year, I make an effort to get rid of things and buy less. It is not easy to do — the machines of desire work constantly and are powerful. I looked at my own spending trends, and I am at about 25 percent of where I was four years ago. I have bought much fewer things and gotten rid of an average 10 things a month. And yet, it is not enough. 

“At the root, what we have is a consumption problem,” says Anika Kozlowski, Assistant Professor of Fashion Design, Ethics & Sustainability at Ryerson University. “Fundamentally, it is a business model that is flawed—capitalism is still functioning on the premise of endless resources.” In a conversation with i-D magazine, Kozlowski noted that there are 150 billion garments being made every year — an incredible number. Fast Company magazine put the number at 100 billion. Another source say, “175 billion items of clothing are made every year. 50 billion go straight to landfill, and another 50 billion go to landfill after not selling.” In 2018, H&M, a Swedish fast-fashion giant burned $4.3 billion worth of inventory.  

Clearly, something has gone horribly wrong. It isn’t a surprise that cotton fields are losing their capabilities, cashmere is running out, and grasslands are vanishing. Sure, you can recycle a lot of fabric — as Iris Textiles of Guatemala has done in tandem with local coffee farmers — but honestly, it isn’t enough. 

“The absolute best thing that anybody can do right now is to not buy anything new, use what you have, repair it, swap it,” Kozlowski told i-D. Dana Thomas, a fashion writer and author of books like Deluxe, recommended “buying less, and buying better.” In an interview with GQ, Thomas — who has a new book called Fashionopolis: The Price of Fast Fashion and the Future of Clothes — said, “We need to move away from the throwaway culture.” In Fast Company, Elizabeth Segran wrote, “The current state of the fashion industry is not working for consumers, or even the brands themselves.” We are wearing less and less of what we own, and that is the ultimate sin of consumerism. 

I was recently introduced to the young and idealistic founders of a small clothing company called Paynter Jacket Company. Becky Okell and Huw Thomas started the company to make a few products, sold only to a few people, to be worn over a long period of time. The premise is to remake iconic jackets for modern life. They make three styles of jackets a year and only 300 units of each jacket. In other words, they sell only 900 units a year. “We’re ultimately trying to make people re-think the way they buy clothes, whether it’s from us or anyone else,” said Okell. “If we have 900 customers per year, but we inspire many more to re-think the way they buy clothing, then that’s a good job well done.” These modern fashion anthropologists/art historians/entrepreneurs are onto something — smaller is definitely better.

My battle to consume less continues on every front: from clothes to household items to everything else. I have been ruthlessly paring down the list of things I want in my life to the absolute favorites. I sometimes share these with you under the rubric: OMakase. It is a constant struggle — much like the lingering impact of smoking, it will be a long time before I can get rid of this problem. 

In the original post, the quote from Becky Okell was incorrectly attributed to Huw Thomas. Error is regretted.

September 14, 2019. San Francisco

Letter from Om

A (nearly) daily dispatch about tech & future.

You will get my reporting, analysis, conversations, and curation of the essential information you need to make sense of the present future.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

My blog has an RSS feed. I am on Twitter @Om

***

Related Posts

  • Words without impact are just noise
  • WeWork drama, Streaming wars, & What (else) to read
  • What to read this weekend

Om Malik

Om Malik is a San Francisco based writer, photographer and investor. More....

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: This is why we love sports
Next Next post: Taxing Personal Data
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feed
Powered by WordPress | Hosted by Pressable

Letter from Om

A (nearly) daily dispatch about tech & future.

You will get my reporting, analysis, conversations, and curation of the essential information you need to make sense of the present future.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

 Twitter
 Email