This past weekend I met Tristan Harris, a Stanford dropout, to talk about his startup Apture, which has developed a cool new way to add a rich media experience to web content in a simple and easy-to-use manner.
Founded in July 2007, the San Mateo, Calif.-based company was started by Harris and three others, and has remained in stealth since, but is now announcing the beta availability of its technology, which has been adopted by the Washington Post for its web site and some of its blogs. So how does it work?
First, the blogger has to embed a tiny sliver of JavaScript code somewhere (preferably in the footer of) their blog template and sign into their account on Apture.com. After that, you can highlight a word or a phrase and can add a link by right-clicking. The company offers web crawl results in an easy-to-use manner, including Wikipedia references, YouTube videos and photos from Flickr, or even PDF files (using Scribd’s iPaper technology.) You can manually add links from your own archives. (See demo)
While it seems simple enough, Harris explained that Apture’s ability to provide relevance and context to all the web index is what gives the tiny startup an edge. In addition, he points to the new user experience as Apture’s advantage. The company has filed patents for some of its key technologies.
From a reader’s perspective, when someone hovers over an Apture linked term, a widget-like box opens, and offers a quick glimpse into related material chosen by the blogger (or site editor). Clicking an item in the floating box menu opens a small window where readers can view an article, video or photo gallery, while continuing to stay on the original page.
It is sort of like those annoying Snap previews, except this preview has a high IQ. This is what I really like about this service, because it allows me to add true context to what I am writing. You can add the same content by copying and pasting code from, say, Flickr, or YouTube or Veoh, but Aptrue makes it dead simple to add this content.
The company, which has raised less than a million dollars in angel funding, wants to give away the service for free to smaller publishers and bloggers, and hopes to make money by charging large publishers. According to Portfolio.com:
Each little pop-up window contains a little banner ad — an ad the Post collects money for, even though, in some cases, it will be adjacent to content from an outside site …editors will avoid creating Apture links to any content that might post rights issues, such as network TV clips.
Apture is going to get a slice of that ad revenue. The problem Apture is going to face is that of scale. Their entire business, despite their technology, is that of business development. It would need supreme execution on their part to become a major force. That is why they should shift their attention to the e-commerce and travel sectors. In high-end e-tail, their technology is highly applicable because visual and video context can help close a sale.
good one – but as you said – does they have deep pocket to support potential expansion of user’s demand.
Rickroll avoidance technology.
“a problem of business development”
CALL ME, I CAN GET THAT WORKED OUT FOR YA.
@ Joe…. that is funny. It made me laugh. 🙂
As an investor in Apture, I can guarantee there is plenty of depth to the pockets behind the company. Beau
patent that?
popup windows, with a pause, showing relevant content, oh wow
oh puleease, it is neat, but any bonehead and a dog can copy this patent or no patent
Om, I think you have missed a fact on your research. I have Snap Shots on several sites I maintain and see nearly exactly type of windows of content that you review here. It is actually much more extensive than aputre including RSS feeds associated with URL’s, Maps etc. they have them all listed on their site: http://www.snap.com/snapshots.php#menu. So I really see apture as a complete copy and nothing new.
@ damon,
the company is not just a pop-up widget. you should give it a whirl on the WaPo website. I think you will see the difference. I think they have patented their “under-the-hood”tech that allows you to get the most relevant information -web, photos, and videos – from the web crawl index.
Hi Om
I am joining this thread very late in the day, because this type of technology has once again been brought to the fore by a company called Zemanta. They have positioned themselves mainly towards bloggers, and also offer an easy way to include relevant photos, articles and links to your blog. There is also Snap, which you mentioned. So which is the best option for bloggers? Would most likely depend on the nature of the blog and its market. These tools may even be used in conjunction with one another for a rich blogging experience. Whether they have compelling revenue models is another matter.