There is a tech boom or a bubble — depending on whom you ask. And with each boom (and bubble) we see an army of financial advisers descend on Silicon Valley. This time a new kind of a financial adviser is coming to town — a software-based online adviser. Wealthfront, a Palo Alto, Calif. company that started its life as Kaching is now opening its door by giving easy tools to manage your finances.

Typically, when someone sells a company or sells stock in the company they worked for, they sign up with a financial adviser who works for a big investment bank like Goldman Sachs or Citibank. This adviser uses modern portfolio theory, asks you dozens of questions to build a risk profile and tries to tell you what is the best way for you to manage and grow your mountain of cash. Of course, you have to pay for this knowledge, typically between 1 percent to 1.5 percent of your assets. Now this isn’t open to everyone. With many of the big banks, you gotta have a few million dollars in your account. If not, you are out of luck.

But there are hundreds of people who make sizable cash when their companies go public or are sold to larger companies. From LinkedIn (s LNKD) to Pandora (s P) to, soon, Facebook, there is a growing number of folks who are looking to find better ways to manage their money. That includes engineers, product managers, designers — folks who are not senior management, founders or c-suite residents. They may not have millions, but they need financial advisor services.

Enter Wealthfront, which has its own variation of modern portfolio theory and has developed its own algorithms for assessing your risk profile. The system asks you a few questions, and gives you your profile and makes suggestions on investing based on that. And the system also allows you to see how you would have done over the years with your risk profile and allocations. The service is free if your assets are under $25,000, if they’re any higher, you pay 0.25 percent of your total assets.

The idea for this new product came after Andy Rachleff, former general partner at Benchmark Capital and now President & CEO of Wealthfront, started hearing from folks at companies like Google (s GOOG) and Facebook about the challenges of dealing with financial advisers. The company has raised almost $10 million from a virtual who’s who of venture capital industry. Rachleff, a veteran of the VC industry, heard the same thing from his investors, many of whom had companies that were either in the process of going public or being acquired.

A year ago, the company changed its focus from being a pure investment advisor to a software-based financial management platform. The new name is reflective of this new approach. Wealthfront founder Dan Carroll, who was trading stocks in his teens, says that while the initial focus is on investors from the technology sector, they will be expanding into general markets as well.

Wealthfront is just one of the many startups that are looking to use software to eliminate the middlemen even from high-touch professions such as financial advisor services. I am pretty sure we are going to see similar ideas emerge in other parts of society.

Om Malik

Om Malik is a San Francisco based writer, photographer and investor. More....

54 thoughts on “As tech booms, the doors to the Wealthfront open”

  51. I cover wealth management apps for professional advisors and see Wealthfront as a potential competitor to professional advisors. But let’s remember that some smart Silicon valley guys have tried this before and failed. http://bit.ly/uj1ZQ4

    Reply

  53. MPT has been discredited by many as BS – this includes Buffett and Munger. Lipstick on a pig don’t make it a princess. In addition to that I think it is pertinent for others to know some of the history here. When kaChing transitioned to Wealthfront, subscribers(such as yours truly) were forced to liquidate if they were subscribed to a non-RIA manager. With the transition now to this MPT crap, again Wealthfront is effectively forcing liquidations by Jan 31 because they are completely dropping the independent manager model. Liquidations have tax consequences and the forced approach here is especially undesirable. Burned twice now, I will not touch these guys with a ten foot pole. Potential subscribers – you have been warned on their fickle musical chairs approach to business models. Screwing your previous subscribers by forcing losses on them is not a good business model. And to replace what Wealthfront had with a crappy, one for the history bins concept like MPT – WOW.

    Reply

  54. MPT has been discredited by many as BS – this includes Buffett and Munger. Lipstick on a pig don’t make it a princess. In addition to that I think it is pertinent for others to know some of the history here. When kaChing transitioned to Wealthfront, subscribers(such as yours truly) were forced to liquidate if they were subscribed to a non-RIA manager. With the transition now to this MPT crap, again Wealthfront is effectively forcing liquidations by Jan 31 because they are completely dropping the independent manager model. Liquidations have tax consequences and the forced approach here is especially undesirable. Burned twice now, I will not touch these guys with a ten foot pole. Potential subscribers – you have been warned on their fickle musical chairs approach to business models. Screwing your previous subscribers by forcing losses on them is not a good business model. And to replace what Wealthfront had with a crappy, one for the history bins concept like MPT – WOW.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.