Cisco’s Chambers is born again Web 2.0

17 thoughts on “Cisco’s Chambers is born again Web 2.0”

  1. I think Cisco are close to understanding web2.0. For all the hype there has virtually been no web2.0 penetration in the large enterprise. I’m sure fortune 500 want the technology but they want it delivered by a large vendor. I think Cisco have their Call Manager product identified as the web/enterprise2.0 box.

    Cisco won the router race with their IOS software, can they win the Enterprise2.0 race by expanding their CCM software into an all in one box?

  2. Simon

    That is true – maybe saying Web 2.0 is very easy compared to collaboration. Because if they were talking about WebEX, it was an old school product, with none of these geegaws.

    I think they need to seriously outline what they plan to do – it is frustration to hear calls with non-specific information.

  3. Let us all define what – web 2.0 – really is?
    – What is “Web 2.0”?
    – What makes a company Web 2.0? Is it Ajax pages, is social network a necessary component of it? (if so would craigslist be a web 2.0 company?). is it the sheer volume of users? (if so would statcounter be a web 2.0 company?

    Oh, the guardians of the technology elixir..Enlighten this soul please.

  4. The shark has been jumped . . . I demand partial credit for pier-to-pier. I typed it by accident in a blog posting (on the now defunct Corante Moore’s Lore) 3 years ago.

  5. Web 2.0 for Cisco means selling more boxes.

    Web 2.0 is really these hundreds of software innovating companies which are in this second phase of Internet – friendster, myspace, jajah, jaxtr and others. And also the SaaS based companies.

    All these companies need routers, switches and softswitches. Thats what Cisco will sell.

    To summarize:
    Cisco buys companies and technologies by selling routers/switches (the funding engine)

  6. I also think the webex purchase was a bad move, for much less money they could have tied up some really good software and people. Dabbledb/37 signals spring to mind straight away, i’m sure we can all think of many more.

    Also even if they did get all the right software I’m not sure they could integrate into a single box. I wonder how 5 across integration is going?

    Cisco do know though that if they stay only in the router/switch market their margins will eventually erode to nothing due to competition from abroad and possibly open source alternatives.

  7. I recently heard Craig Tobias from Cisco speak at a conference. He has been responsible for driving the entire ROS division (massive network operations) to a Web 2.0 shop. Every aspect of the business in run using Web 2.0.

  8. I always had a hard time following Cisco’s documents with all the release notes, hopefully this will end all that now the documents are moving to a wiki.

    The wiki looks very nice. One of the best I’ve seen so far.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.