Comcast rings Mickey Mouse

9 thoughts on “Comcast rings Mickey Mouse”

  1. I think your comp is off – the comp isn’t AOL/Time-Warner, the comp is DirecTV/News Corp. Here’s the reasons why it’s different:

    1. Time-Warner was supposed to deliver content to AOL – but they had fundamentally different products – one was a bunch of different content from magazines to video, the other email to chat. There wasn’t a way to deliver TW video, for instance, to the typical AOL customer on a large scale. In contrast, Comcast will be able to immediately use the Disney properties in interesting ways that they’ve already talked about. This is a case of vertical integration – not putting apples and oranges together.

    2. Comcast has shown some ability to absorb another large entity – it makes one have more faith that they can do better on the integration of the two than AOL/TW where the integration was difficult.

    3. Pixar ain’t the reason to buy Disney – it’s the networks and the library.

    All that said, I’m not sure it’s going to be worth the money they’ll have to pay for Disney at the end of the day – especially since their first offer is likely to be rejected.

  2. somewhere I read that Paul Allen ( MSFT cofounder ) is in the board of Comcast.

    I dont know its a conspiracy theory or not, it seems MSFT is using paul as a proxy to own the internet by acquiring ATT broadband and silently using Warren Buffet to get L3 communications. I even read some where they are actually trying to get UUNet. If they get the internet hubs then they control content going back and forth.

    IMHO this bid looks like not for content but to own the Disney’s entertainment collection and the revenue generated from its Disney land which will give a good collection from the PPV channl.Also given the fact that Disney’s board is in quagmire its good time to get Disney. On the other hand, I am confused why comcast hasnt offered only market value for Disney, usually the acquiring company offers a little bit more then market value.

  3. I think that you have a couple of concepts backwards.

    First, the best time to buy Disney is just after the growth engine dropped out of the car – Pixar. If you and I can figure that out the without Pixar Disney is so 1970s, then you have to think that the Disney board has a clue of this as well. What could be better than talking to the board while the feeling of fear and panic is fresh on the minds?

    Second, without the Pixar deal the stock is a cheap, real cheap, and if over the next few weeks Eisner were to come to his senses and find a way to make a deal with Jobs, the price of Disney would rise beyond Comcast’s grasp. Remember Pixar has a gaggle of new movies ready for Fall 04 and early 05.

    This is the golden moment for Comcast, if they are going to make a play they better do it now, while broadband is in high demand, the Analyst think that it is there future and before the Baby Bells figure out how to lay fiber to your home or get the government to subsidize DSL.

    Comcast needs to leap for the golden ring or go home. More power to them.

  4. In general the large cable providers are stuck in a mindset that’s very 1999.

    The approach of their industry technical consortium (CableLabs) is to force vendors to develop Cable-specific proprietary technological solutions (eg. their PacketCable telephony standard which unlike Vonage etc. binds the application to the distribution channel).

    Not only does this leave vendors with little room for product differentiation (so that vendors must then sell these systems at rock-bottom prices), it leaves cable operators messing around with technology that the rest of the internet world is not much interested in anymore (eg. managed quality of service, MGCP).

  5. James – the Disney/Pixar deal not happening is the best thing for all parties involved – Eisner, I believe, is smart to walk away from what Jobs wanted – a flat 10% distribution fee for each movie including the last two on the current contract (The Incredibles and Cars). That would have significantly reduced the income from those two movies, plus all future ones from around $500m to, say $70-100m. Eisner would be letting something close to $1b of revenue walk away by signing that deal. Pixar, meanwhile, gets to go to another studio and get the deal they want – so everyone wins by walking away.

  6. Pingback: Telepocalypse

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.