32 thoughts on “Roll your own Google Search”

  1. Ok, so it’s news.

    I’d prefer to see an analysis comparing the tool – or its goals – to identical offerings from Yahoo! (Searchbuilder) or Microsoft (Search Macros). What does the fact that Google is introducing what sounds like a less developed feature set after its two main competitors say about Google? etc and so on.

    Otherwise, you’re just copying and pasting.

  2. Michael, isn’t that exactly what I said. They need to sweeten the pot in order to make this work, otherwise not going to happen. Of course, the issue is bigger than that – the search is getting clouded and that’s not good for them.

  3. Pingback: Tech Beat
  4. Pingback: Fischmarkt
  5. Om,

    This is just letting the the folk get at the metadata build (in the old days – c 2004 – it was called a Folksonomy ;), or “McTagging”

    I agree with your analysis re Google though…this service raises a “what value do they add” question, compared to using something like say Dogpile, and then configuring a relevance vertical on top of that…and then who gets to show the ads?

  6. For a ‘naive’ Google user, I don’t really see the new customn search engine being a great pull. It’s one more thing for the user to do, after all. Personal Search/search over your search history is a different matter, where your search history inform your future search results. (After all, if i have to visit a site to bookmark it, why not let google just remember that I clicked through to it previously.)

    searchfeedr (website link above) offers a different approach, whereby you can reuse other link collections to provide either a page or domain limited search. FOr example, you can limit your search to domains listed in an RSS feed, or tagged in a particular way on a delicious user’s account; or even use the links contained within – or that link to – a particular page.

    Like Rollyo, the number of domains you can link to are limited – but how many people look past the first page of results anyway?

    Another advantage fo searchfeedr is that it is a search engine intermediary – page/domain limited searches can be made on one of any number of search engines (at the moment, you can choose to pull results from Google, Yahoo, Windows live or altavista).

    Add to this the abilty to save search profiles to a delicious account, from where saved searches can be pulled back in to you searchfeedr page, and the new Google offering seems – well – a bit dull really 😉


  7. Upon checking this out, three features stood out:
    1) You can exclude sites that you do not want in the results
    2) You can easily do so using the Google Marker
    3) Anyone can volunteer to help

    So we decided to throw up an experiment to encourage everyone to mark spam sites to be excluded from search results.

    Working together as a community we may be able to radically improve the quality of the search results (or perhaps just get in a blacklisting war?)

    The result is Putch – http://www.putch.com

  8. This seems like an obvious development to me and I’m not sure why they’ve just now come out with it. I’d think someone would have dropped this little app out in a single day using their 20% time for personal projects. I still think what’s missing in search is a viable social search function that integrates authority and expertise to someone’s rating (http://www.emergingearth.com/social-networking-tagging/). Why should a 12-year old’s opinion of a website on stem cell research carry the same weight as a senior geneticist at the Mayo Clinic?

  9. Om, thanks for the coverage. I’ve given Google Custom Search a whirl and am using it to set up a new and hopefully spam free index at http://www.BlogSearchEngine.com

    You’re on the list in the index and I’m accepting volunteers who want to use Co-op to contribute to my index and/or submit their own blog.

    It took about 20 minutes to set up the new Google Custom powered search at BSE and given the power I have over the index and its contributors, I’m quite happy.

    Now just need to build it 🙂

  10. Search is still the main revenue source for google and this feature definitely makes their position solid in the search market.

    More appropriate name for this feature would be ‘google everywhere’!

  11. Alexa Web Search Vs Google Custom Search Engine

    With Alexa you pay $.30 for 1000 request, Google is free
    Google has this “community” twist, its missing from Alexa’s offering.
    Alexa’s offering require more programming talent.

    How hard it would be to put together a Custom search using Google, nicely integrated with Alexa’s website thumbnail service.

  12. Michael Arrington/TechCrunch? Do you realize that 99.9% of the Internet community has no idea who he is?

    There are millions of specialists who can create great searches from Rollyo/Google and other engines.

  13. ah, another smart google move: let our users do the work and we enjoy the nice stock price ride right up to the split level 🙂

    true that it’s a smart move, but it shows how outdated the companies search technology as they’ve invested in building the google empire … and not so smart for the users.

    Om, you seem to think whatever google does is smart … you need to take your googles off every once in a while 😉

  14. Hey not sure if that is true webtrucker. remember my google finance post – or many others. i am just saying that money (lots of it) with custom search is a good idea. custom search with piddly little adsense money is a big yawn. i guess i need to be more direct when i say that 😉

  15. Om…you said that “It is a clever idea on Google’s part”, what you shouldh ave rather said that this is a clever “copied” idea.

    Microsoft’s Live search had this feature called ‘Macros’ much earlier and the UI look and feel is much better than Google’s

    Seems that these days Google doesnt seem to do much innovation after all. Asa respected blogger you should mention the fact that competing search engines have this feature and this is not something Google thought of for the benefit of its users.

  16. What will happen to those vertical search engines having invested millions in building their own solutions!!! I think some of them are doomed unless they have value added service in addition to the vertical search!!

    For me now the real Vertical Search Engine war has begun. Also I think with this, Google is combining social search with vertical flavour and allowing community to mushroom around it.

    Google has played the check step and launching the community soldier to play checkmate step. 🙂

    More comments in my blog :

  17. Pronob,

    saying it is a copied idea was obvious. i am sure my readers know all about yahoo, microsoft and rollyo’s efforts. of course it is a copied idea, so here you go i said it.

  18. A bit off context but any particular reason why there is a sudden or rather a gradual increase in the number of comments on this particular blog from people of Indian origin compared to other tech blogs? Any major coverage of late in Indian media about GigaOm.com?

  19. Hi,

    I just did my first niche se using google’s cse service called http://www.scriptoogle.com

    But too much of co-branding in there and there is now ay, i can turn off adsense ads, if i am not a dsense publisher yet. Also, less flexibility in customising the search results page. tooo bad.

  20. Hi,

    well creating a cse by coop is easy.
    Finding these cse is the hard part.

    We created the first directory for cse created by google co-op or websites that have a google coop cse intergrated.

    Its free of course, and it would really help if you could submit your cse there.

    You can find it at http://www.coopdir.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.