In Game Ads Don’t Work

6 thoughts on “In Game Ads Don’t Work”

  1. If there were ads for Domino’s or Chinese Take Out that I could click on through the player, have it paid through Xbox Live/PS2 Live, and have it delivered or ready for pick up, I would then pay attention to the advertisements.

  2. Advertising is such an arbitrary industry. Is the study testing people’s memory or the effectiveness of branding in-game? I personally find that in-game ads are a waste of money past the first one you see that makes you think “cool,” but I can’t vouch for the rest and there really is no reliable way to track success without direct sales like SlickDealer brought up.

  3. I strongly disagree.

    I think that in-game ads are one of the most efficient and effective forms of advertising based on ROI. The ability for a consumer to interact with a given product or corporate experience is powerful, assuming it is not overdone.

    Nowadays, consumers ignore banner ads, magazine spreads, and TV commercials. In-game ads cannot be ignored as they are an integral part of the game.

    Studies have shown that a majority of players actually enjoy interacting with consumer products in the games.

    Even if you overlook conversion ratios altogether and look at it from a more high-level view, I still think it is fair to say that such an advertising ploy is much more effective than any other form of traditional media advertising.

    Cheers,
    Aidan

  4. If the study had compared in-game ads with product placement in films, or against a TV program sponsorship wth some measure of ad exposure (it is unclear what Bunnyfoot’s SFI measure is, it’s not explained on their website).
    I think this is actually a good piece of marketing for Bunnyfoot services, after all, a WTF reaction is better than an ‘Oh, I see’.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.