Joost To Kill Desktop Client

83 thoughts on “Joost To Kill Desktop Client”

  1. Will Joost only work with this plugin? Or is ther a browser only version which I can use with, let’s say, Linux? Until now there is no Joost software for Linux, but plenty of browsers.

  2. From our experience, even a small plugin install will cause a huge loss/dropoff in usage (~33% difference in bounce rate). We see it all of the time on Mefeedia when comparing Flash vs. Quicktime embeds (even though many people have iTunes, that doesn’t necessarily mean they have the QT Browser plugin).

    Nonetheless, it will be interesting to see how the Web-based version of Joost develops!

  3. Im sure Joost still going to develop “clients” for devices in the future but it will based on their new Framework , but I suspect they will keep elements of the current Joost Client UI for TV based devices.

    But the standalone client as we know it is dead .

    Also the Joost plugin in that is in closed early beta testing works with Google Chrome even though it wasn’t tested with Chrome.I know that some of the Joost people where even surprised by that.

    As for Linux and Mac plugins they are coming also and Joost even has had a Job opening for a Plugin Developer for those Platforms advertised for the past couple of months .

    Joost Plugin Developer Job listing
    http://www.joost.com/jobs/08014ins.html

  4. Sounds like they are still P2P and are going to still be running a client on your PC. They are trying to reposition themselves as browser based when in fact they are not. But I guess since Adobe gets people to think that Flash is “browser based” why shouldn’t Joost try the same story.

  5. The Web-based application is already in closed beta. Some users on our site have already tried it, but this morning Joost wouldn’t confirm anything other than the fact that they were testing a “new product.” My name is linked to the article.

    Ian Lamont
    Managing Editor
    The Industry Standard

  6. Pingback: Unfortune
  7. Joost has so lost its way, they need to be a cloud service / overlay for the existing web video sites. BitTorrent browser plug-ins already exist, why re-invent the wheel?

  8. @Todd The Bittorent protocol cant stream it can only download .

    The clients/plugins that “sthttp://s.wordpress.com/wp-content/themes/vip/gigaom3/images/elements/comment-button.pngream” torrents like Foxtorrent and Swarmplayer actually only use the torrent link as a bootstrap and then its streamed via a different protocol.

    Joost is a p2p video service supported by Ads and maybe they can still be a partner with HULU .Joltid (owned by Joosts Founders) that powers Skype and Joost is already a cloud service /overlay for the internet so they dont need Joost to do that for them .

  9. Is it just me, or is all of Joost’s real value in its back-end technology? Why waste time trying to create a new collection of TV channels when it can license out the P2P tech to existing networks that can create their own branded channels?

    You would think an AT&T or a Verizon could use Joost to create a cheap set-top box video plan that would lure people away from cable — DSL plus ESPN for a fraction of the cost, and you can watch your TV on the road from your laptop, too. Or does that involve too many short-sighted companies trying to work together?

  10. The Kazaa/Skype/Joost guys are way too dedicated to P2P technology. As we’ve seen, practically everything works better with a regular ole client/server setup. Bandwidth and server costs have gone down so much and are complemented by Akamai, et. al. that P2P isn’t buying them much.

  11. Pingback: Tecneira
  12. @pwb @Om Malik

    “…Bandwidth and server costs have gone down so much and are complemented by Akamai, et. al. that P2P isn’t buying them much.”

    Actually with Comcast’s newly implemented bandwidth caps ( all other ISPs to follow suit? ) P2P is very much relevant all over again!

    Watching streaming video, especially HD, will burn through your cap real quick!

  13. Well I tried Joost after long time .. was surprised client was taken out .. Then web based player is just like any other unless it incorporates p2p .

    But yes compared to most sites, the videos run much smoother on joost web player.

    Siddharth Menon
    Borget Solutions

  14. Pingback: My Football Writer

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.