17 thoughts on “Motorola Cuts Could Be Bad News for Windows Mobile”

  1. Motorola needs to release Android handsets ASAP to:
    1. establish themselves as a leading Android handset provider.
    2. generate quick sales/revenue from the pent-up demand for Android devices.

  2. It wouldnt be too suprising if they drop their Windows Mobile phones. Ballmer made comments at CES saying they are going to be restricting/cutting a number of manufacturers of WinMo devices citing the need to work more closely with device mfgr’s to provide a better end to end user experience.

  3. “…To date, Motorola, Samsung and HTC have been the three major vendors pushing Windows Mobile smartphones, so Motorola’s withdrawal is likely to be acutely felt in Redmond. HTC, another Microsoft loyalist has planned quite a few new Android-based phones for 2009, ones that are being welcomes by phone companies as well.”

    Windows mobile’s outrageous licensing costs and quagmire signing policies ( per handset no less ) are the &REAL* problem, Android is just providing a zero overhead cost solution. In this era of corporate belt tightenting, I bet the account departments are taking a good, hard look at why they pay Microsoft a dollar per handset for the privilage of installing Windows mobile when Android has no such costs. Saving a few million dollars per quarter, passing that savings onto the stock holders with just a few clicks of the backspace key? Oh yes!

    Plus having Windows mobile usurped by Android, regulating it to a tiny niche market helps us long suffering app developers – Android is truly write one app for all handsets ( and MIDs and tablets and netbooks, on and on ! ).

  4. Motorola has never been truly excellent at anything but RF circuitry. Every few years that expertise lets them make a smaller handset or an early entrant on a new wireless standard. Their phones have never been anything special to use and they don’t know the first thing about making good software. The iPhone has set a bar they simply cannot reach without outside help. WinMobile and Symbian don’t have enough market share to bet the company on. Linux looks like the obvious choice, but some generic build won’t cut it without developer support and an App Store. By partnering with Google they get a huge pile of money driving app development. It all makes sense, but how many Android handsets do you need to ship at one time? iPhone-like, Blackberry-like, Sidekick-like, flip phone, candybar. Camera model and music model. It doesn’t make sense to have dozens of models when they all run the same software.

    Microsoft still has Samsung, LG, and HTC, which is probably plenty. Microsoft doesn’t let handset vendors mess around with the software, so there’s not much point in having lots of vendors if they can only innovate on the mechanical design. There’s nothing stopping Microsoft from hiring a good industrial design firm to wrap a shell around an HTC hardware design and selling it under their own name.

  5. It is inevitable that Android will become the leading mobile operating system.
    I mean, Apple will also be a significant player, but everyone else will have to move to Android.
    I will bet Nokia will come up with an android phone not more then 2 years from now. They have such fanstastic capabilites, but the “ancient” Symbian OS just does not stand a chance.

    Motorola CEO has probably made the best decision he could take. I hope to see some very good cellular phones from Motorola soon and hopeful that they will become again a top tier handset manufacturer.

  6. Got feel for the poor employees at MSFT. The Q9x was one of the “work” phones besides the BlackJack series that they could carry. I have a inlaw that is a director at MSFT and said she would have been shot if you showed up to work with a RIM device, though I am sure some there have iPhones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.