18 thoughts on “Mozilla To Spin Out Thunderbird As A Company”

  1. Hello:

    I have used mozilla browser but, I am still currently using internet explorer.

    I still IE more simple and easier to use, plus it think mozilla has alot of code errors.

  2. i am expecting great things from these guys, though i should temper my expectations. on the positive, they have the right under pinnings of what could be an interesting next generation email client.

  3. I think Mozilla is putting a happy spin on this for the Thunderbird user base (of which I am one), but the truth is that dedicated e-mail clients are likely to soon go the way of dedicated NNTP clients — useful, but something you might not use everyday. Web-based e-mail is poised to be the primary interface. The reason for this is that more and more of us use multiple computers every single day (home, work, smartphone) and we’d like the e-mail for all of them to be in sync. Sure, this could be done with standalone clients and IMAP, but only if your mail server supports IMAP and most of us do not have access to such a thing for personal e-mail. Even for small businesses, it makes more sense to use GMail or Yahoo rather than run your own server and again that means no IMAP. I think the future of e-mail for the masses is web interface as your primary client, with widgets/plugins to notify you of new mail and archive messages for offline viewing.

  4. Outsourcing your email provision to a specialist company makes a lot more sense – I use a webhost that does good IMAP, as it happens, but there are people who swear by Fastmail, because all they do is email. Either way, you get the best of both worlds – webmail and IMAP, so you can efficiently grab your email and read it offline on smartphone, MID, etc.

    The bandwidth and screen required for webmail (and the time to fire up a laptop) is not always there – if you travel a lot, frequently you have only a lower bandwidth wireless connection, IMAP is the way to go, along with a mail client. If the Foleo returns and/or MIDs take off, that could help webmail somewhat, but only if the bandwidth is easily available.

  5. Richard, you make good points, but they are all addressable. Well done webmail needs no more screen space than a standalone client. The thing that wastes space is ads. Webmail does not automatically mean ad-supported — my Comcast webmail has no ads. You already don’t need a laptop for webmail — any smartphone with a decent browser can handle most services well enough. As for the times when you don’t have a good internet connection, I agree that is the big issue. That’s why I said previously that one of the things webmail needs to become the prime interface is a plugin or widget to take care of archiving for offline access.

  6. Looks like, Thunderbird is going to take over the email client market soon.

    Kinda like Firefox did with the browser market? Oh wait, that hasn’t happened yet — not even close.

  7. Richard makes great points.

    I am happy to see this as Thunderbird has the Eudora rights from Qualcomm. Perhaps as a separate company they will do something with the splendid intellectual property bequeathed to them.

    There’s definitely room for an IMAP client that does the job properly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.