31 thoughts on “Nokia's Brave New Strategy: Laptops”

  1. I don’t want to say Nokia’s success is impossible without seeing an actual product and a business plan. But this seems to be a reflexsive response to the notebook cos moving in on their turf than a well thought out idea.

    The fact the PC/notebook makers are jumping headlong into the smartphone market tells you the grass isn’t greener on the computer side of the fence. Moreover, Nokia doesn’t have distribution channels for computers in place. Are they planning to sell netbooks in their app store? That would e quite a download.

    BTW. There is one computer maker that has found success in the handset business. But none of the PC makers have done it – yet.

  2. Olli’s quote needs interpretation.

    I expect something else than just boring Windows laptops. It must be something handier, inspired by the Android netbooks they talk about now. Maybe a Symbian netbook or finally a great Nokia Internet Tablet with faster CPU and 3G.

    Most of my work is browser based and emails. I don’t need a full fledged PC OS anymore. My N810 would have been my favourite toy, if it had a better browser and 3G. Now it’s my T-Mobile G1.

  3. a nokia version of a netbook running s60 is more likely and no doubt the sucessor to the N internet tablet range. It will also run firebox for mobile.

  4. I assume they see netbooks as an emerging market they don’t want to be left out of.

    Stacey’s article “Smartphones and Netbooks” argues that, chip-wise, a netbook it is not far from a smartphone.
    The same can be said for the OS: Android is set to power next generation netbooks.

    Plus, Nokia’s channel (carriers) are salivating to add netbooks to their portfolios – add a SIM card, and sell data contracts galore.

    Look at Nokia’s DNA: they excel at designing, managing the manufacturing process and the distribution channel of digital consumer devices. Yesterday feature-phones, today smartphones. Tomorrow?

    You are right in that the margins are probably razor-thin, but I would assume that Nokia is quite used to that.

    What sounds awkward is the wording: “notebook” sounds very last century. I assume what Olli meant is “netbooks” but that got lost in translation.

  5. Nokia has the internet tablet running their own version of Linux called Maemo, and have also acquired folks like Trolltech who own QT GUI framework which is very powerful. So Nokia actually has the software expertise to pull off something like this, they really need to focus on quality of their software and user experience. Their N series phones have proven that they can make really good hardware.

    Also, Nokia has re-invented themselves once when it sold off everything (TV, Tires, etc) and focused on cellphone, and they can re-invent themselves again. They are still going strong in most countries, so if they do things right, they can succeed.

  6. “It has yet to launch a credible touch screen phone to compete with LG, Samsung, HTC and every other handset maker.”

    Well, the Nokia 5800 is better than all LG, Samsung and non-Android HTC phones… It’s only missing applications to be a really cool alternative to them (….ok… I don’t compare it to an Iphone)

  7. It would be great to see a nokia version of one laptop per child. As you say they are huge in the developing world and could distribute easily to the remotest village. Combine that with nokia wimax base-stations and we could see a really interconnected world. They’d have to create a beautifully simple user interface, which they might struggle with, but it would certainly be interesting to see. Nokia Information Communications Entertainment would be nice!

  8. Think ARM-powered, Maemo-running small netbooks. Cheap CPUs, free OS.
    Why do you think Nokia contributes heavily to Mozilla?
    Why do you think Maemo is the first platform mozilla mobile ever ran on?
    Hell, it might even please google because of the cloud-based approach.

  9. This is the opposite of what should be happening. As marketshare starts to dwindle on laptops where it is gaining on smart-phones, why aren’t the laptop companies buiding smartphones. In 5-10 years laptops will be close to extinction with the smartphone doing most of the work.

  10. If the 3G attach rate goes up in netbooks, and it probably will, then Nokia will have much better pre-existing distribution channels to service providers worldwide than most trdiyional netbook manufacturers.

  11. When Nokia created Symbian with the old Epoc resources, I was hoping that they would get it. Like Netscape, they refused to move into new areas and missed a market. Psion created the NetBook profile, and Nokia could have furthered the cloud efforts and created the “terminal.” Instead, we have retreads of Windows, Linux, and hopefully one day OS X.

    Where Nokia could have created a profitable model is through subscription, as they do with phones. If I got a NetBook with a $30 connection fee, that may be of interest to many. It probably does take low margin producers to keep the costs in line though.

  12. This one is a canard caused by inaccurate translation / not capturing the tone of voice in the translation.

    In the original Finnish language TV interview, which I saw myself, the host asked CEO Kallasvuo, whether Nokia’s going to move to the laptop business at some point. Kallasvuo answered something like “we’re looking at this opportunity also” with a neutral “never say never” tone – he was by no means actively stating that Nokia’s moving into the laptop business, as the Reuters article suggests.

  13. @David,

    I used the 5800 and it is as bad as any one of the touch screen phones, though Samsung Insight is pretty far along. Regardless, it is NOT a worthy competitor. And I wouldn’t take one for free. Seriously, not joking about it.

  14. @Olli,

    Is there a chance you can provide a link to the original post and suggest how best to get a translation for the interview. I would like to amend my article to reflect the correct tone.

    Regardless, my thesis about Nokia facing a tough road ahead isn’t going to change anytime soon, unless they change as a company. 🙂

  15. I think they certainly see that the mobile market is changing where more powerful computing devices are required/desired. Good for them for recognizing it unlike Moto. This model at least let’s them break a little bit away from carrier lock, use more wifi technologies, open up their architecture to developers, play NDS games, etc.

    Not unlike many large companies, my understanding of Nokia’s internal ops is that they have a bunch of fiefdoms and encourage a kind of cut throatism in development, so it may never see the light of day anyway and is a nice PR play.

  16. Om,

    The original TV interview can be seen here: http://www.yle.fi/java/areena/dispatcher/1923984.asx?bitrate=1

    It’s in Finnish, so I guess it won’t do you much good. ; ) Maybe you might want to get a third opinion from a native speaker beyond the Reuters reporter & myself?

    My point wasn’t about your thesis about Nokia, merely that the source behind your article is a misinterpretation of the original interview. And thinking about this a bit further, if Nokia was to move to the laptop business, would they announce it in a TV interview in Finland? I don’t think so…

  17. @Olli

    Any recommendations on the Finnish translation person. I really don’t know many folks there, and the ones that I know are well on the move today 🙂

  18. For Google I can understand the motivation to get into that market.

    Business value = Eyeballs * intent

    They got the eyeballs now they have to increase intent to sell more valuable ad space, as higher the intent as higher the ad price. For this they really need to know personal data, since intent can be calculated out of the context a person is searching. To make up a freaky example. Am I just a car fan and looking at the new Porsche or am I in the market for a new sports car and have visited a few car dealers in my area?
    This distinction can easily be made with personal data available to my search, best in combination of data from a personal device I carry around.
    In the end Google could provide a better user experience with more relevant data no matter the form factor.

    Nokia can do what? Compete on price? There were MP3 players before before iTunes, separate Office applications before MS Office. In the end integrated experience won.
    Or maybe Nokia’s spreadsheet shows that Google is just Google and all the data point to price and execution and they can compete on that.
    Nokia always seemed to me like Sony in the consumer device area (not game console), they really don’t get Software, it always feels awkward even if all the features are there.

  19. Om and Olli,

    There is another article about this interview over at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/26/nokia_laptops/

    And the translation there is:

    “We don’t have to look even for five years from now to see that what we know as a mobile phone and what we know as a PC are in many ways converging,” Kallasvuo told broadcaster YLE when questioned about Nokia’s aspirations towards the lap. “We are looking very actively also at this opportunity.”

  20. Some might argue that if Dell can think of possibly getting into the smartphone biz, why can’t a smartphone / mobile phone manufacturer go the other way. Well I think today Nokia needs to stay very focussed on the fantastic job of making superb phones and try and make solid biz phones that emulate a PC .. Nokia is already doing this if one has to go by the 2009 roadmap. There’s gonna be a huge demand for 3G/HSPA/Wimax/LTE smartphones .. it’ll be wiser to strengthen their core technology around simple but USP laden things battery life / more processor speeds (upwards of 1Ghz .. there is talk of 1.5Ghz … who needs a laptop), etc etc .. I agree with Om – thers just no need for a netbook anymore. Be Niche be profitable .. please be with the evolution of smartphones instead.

Leave a Reply to Nicholas Paredes Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.