31 thoughts on “Tough Times Ahead For Steve Jobs”

  1. It is interesting that the article does not even broach the topic of what customers want. But then I guess the music industry does not really care what customers want either.

  2. The opening up argument is just another ruse on the part of the music companies to break Apple’s hold so they can raise prices. Are there many dissuaded from buying online at iTMS or any WMA store because of lack of DRM interoperability? Are there iPod owners who say I won’t buy from iTMS because someday I may own a non-iPod? That would be giving our consumers too much credit for forward-thinking. Now it might be true that non-iPod owners may envision owning an iPod and that would dissuade them, but that’s a fairly small population.

    I think more are dissuaded because they want higher quality than 128kbps, which they can get via CD.

    At a minimum, on principle alone, Apple should not provide Fairplay to any music store or music player until WM 10 and Janus is available for the Mac OS. WMA DRM is just as proprietary and non-interoperable as Fairplay.

  3. Funny, isn’t it? When Apple has a “monopoly”, they “abuse” it by standing up to RIAA against price gauging the consumers. Quite different from Microsoft’s monopolistic practices. Keep on “abusing” your “monopoly”, Apple.

  4. I know Jobs is too smart to do this, but if he wanted to send a shot across the music industry’s bow, he could setup a new music company. Pickup one or two freshly dropped groups with solid followings, and just give them a sweatheart deal.

    Jobs has a strong hand to play via “the talent” angle.

    Seriously this showdown is the classic battle between distribution and content. So sooner or later they’ll get in each other’s business.

    Buying content to boost the value of your distribution asset is the age-old Turner/Murdoch play. I sure hope Jobs has got some super secret talent hidden away for all the implusive 12 yros.

    I think the end of the NYTimes article gives this up for what it is. At 99cts per full song on iTunes vs. ~$3 for a cheesy ringtone, the mobile carriers are telling the music industry to raise Steve’s prices, otherwise we’re going to look like morons and not make any money. Telecom hates competition.

    Just think of the sky-rocketing customer care costs for the carriers when these music services launch. I mean the one thing carriers have never mastered is a billing system without errors and massive hassles.

    And yes, the consumer is the least important player here.

  5. I read recently that there is new audible book service geared for libraries that will download to everything BUT iPods– it’s in Windows Media, you know. What a boneheaded concept; selling a stillborn piece of dreck to cash-strapped libraries.

    I expect we will soon see so much free iPod soken word content (starting with Podcasts, moving to literature) that libraries will soon see thee folly of buying anything Bill Gates is pushing.

  6. Quite different from Microsoft’s monopolistic practices.

    Not totally different. Apple is trying to reduce the prices for things that they don’t make in order to sell more of their own complementary goods. Microsoft has plenty of times tried to reduce the prices for competing products in the same way, or tried to reduce hardware costs in order to sell more software; Intel tries to foster cooperation in operating systems similarly. Let’s not forget that one of the big charges against Microsoft was in undercutting Netscape, which tried to charge $49 for its browser.

    All these companies are out to make money. Sometimes one company making profits is good for consumers, but don’t fool yourself into thinking that they act out of pure altruism. Apple wants to charge less for songs in order to sell more iPods.

  7. I think the game is changing, Apple doesn’t need to buy content to feed it’s distribution channel…They just make it real easy for artists to become their own distributors…easy tools, guidelines, support, etc. If the artist makes it a 3-6 month iTunes exclusive, they throw in visible iTunes promotions, marketing and possibly ads. Apple gets all the advantages of owning without putting out any cash. They lead the way into the future where record companies and recording contracts aren’t as important. All they need is a few big names to sign on and they are off and running.

  8. It’s a bit rich to see a music industry exec complaining that Apple isn’t making much money off downloads since most of the 99 cents a song goes to the music industry, and the rest just covers Apple’s costs. Perhaps if they shared more profits with apple, Apple would be more amenable.

  9. Raising prices? For 99 cents you get an inferior product to CDs in so many ways (sound quality, interoperability, liner notes, etc.)… so prices should be less. But regardless, I’m still not buying any DRM crap.

  10. Pingback: larry borsato
  11. All these years the record companies have been sticking it to the consumers. They promised the price of CDs would come down after a year or two when first introduced, it never did.
    I really hope Apple introduces their own Music Company, obviously not Apple Records, but something that will stick it to those greedy bastard Record Labels.
    Go Getum Apple!

  12. i like jobs, he kicks ass, he give customers what they want. he’s a visionary. he pushes, strives and entertains….

    RIAA, they’re dogs, they sue their customers, the produce crap, they’re a monopoly who doesn’t “get” their clients.

    they’re alot like washington, wrongheaded stubborn and insensitive.

    remember CDs were 11.99 when they 1st came out.
    now they cost 17.99. in 2005, they should cost less than 4.00 …
    remember when CDs came out

  13. Considering the labels will be dealing with Steve Jobs, I really think your title should have been “Tough Times Ahead for Record Labels.” Even if he ultimately concedes to some of their conditions, you got to know he’ll make their lives a living hell during the process. Yes, he can be an SOB, but never forget, he’s our SOB.

  14. Those poor recording industry execs.

    How are they going to afford their nose powder in the years to come?


  15. iTunes will survive at 99cents…


    P2P will survive at zero cents.

    Either way, iPods still sell. And MP3s still work, no matter where iPod owners get them, even jail 😉

    The ‘industry’ had a very good run, 1982-2000. But, these guys need to shift gears. Which they will, eventually. They are way too fixed in their thinking, and need to learn to operate from the same mindset as ‘Carnies’. Ever changing their strategy – to make money however they can.

    We need to say no to their current one.

    Most folks don’t mind paying – even a high price on some items. But in today’s world, only the most foolish of us can’t see that we’re clearly been gouged.

  16. So very true. Apple will still sell iPods even if the online music downloads business goes belly up. They’ll just be filled with CD-ripped and p2p (for those who don’t mind illegal) music. Likely more of the latter than the former if CD prices keep going up.

    And if the WMA-protected CD trend expands, maybe that’ll even drive people to Macs, where it has no effect at all.

  17. It has been 5 years since I bought a retail CD, for the very reason of the record exec’s endless greed. I know I will never buy another.

  18. Well, All I can say is that I still buy my CD’s from the store, then rip them and play them on any one of the 5 mp3 players or 7 computers in the house. Frog em is what I say, I’ll keep buying my CD’s at the store, ripping them, and playing the MP3’s where ever I feel like, the music industry had it’s chance….

  19. Pingback: Nahenahe.Net

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.