Yet Another DRM? The Google DRM

22 thoughts on “Yet Another DRM? The Google DRM”

  1. Maybe it’s me; maybe CES has spread from it’s roots as THE Consumer ELECTRONICS Show but doesn’t anyone else think that Google’s announcement belongs outside CES or in a Press Release. Sure, computers are electronics but the service that’s being hyped is purely an online (software) play – no hardware involved

  2. I also noticed the omission of the DRM system. I’m guessing the writers didn’t really understand the significance of it. What I also find funny is that while Microsoft has been actively licensing its DRM out to others (i.e. Yahoo!), Apple has refused to and I think it’s unlikely Google will either.

  3. I hope they bundle it with a Skype phone.

    Screw all these companies and their proprietary crap. Sorry, I’m just getting fustrated with all of this. Locked cell phones, proprietary VoIP hardware, MSN and Skype phones… oh, and worst of all DRM. This is not progress.

  4. Pingback: Emergintex
  5. Come now Om, I expected more from you than this. Wiegh the options, get all the info first!

    If Google is going to sell premium content from people like TV networks and movie studios, they don’t have a choice but to include DRM with their content. There’s NO WAY the likes of the big networks and studios would allow someone to download content without some kind of use-limiting wrapper that protects their interests. Whether it’s good or bad, I’m not going to debate that, but for the record, I hate DRM, but I understand that it’s necessary whenever you’re going to sell content. You have to have some way as a content distributor to make sure that the person who gets your stuff can use it, but not spread it around the world for free-it’d defeat your whole business plan.

    The article doesn’t even discuss WHAT KIND of DRM is going to be in the movies, and what you can and can’t do with the movies. If Google can strike the line between making sure I can do whatever I want with my movies short of giving them away for free to all my friends and relatives while simultaneously protecting my privacy, then they could be an example of how to protect both the customer AND the distributor. Wait until the details are released before passing judgement, although I doubt they’ll be able to hit that line.

    It’s not DRM that’s evil, it’s the way so many companies have implimented it; that is, sacrificing our rights and privacy for the benefit of the distributors and content owners.

  6. Why aren’t we talking about the fact that mainstream people (like your mom) don’t like to watch video on their PC’s? Or their 2.5″ portable screens? Especially content that is longer than 10 minutes…

    It’s exciting to see so much energy reinvested into this market but until and unless this content gets to the TV set with simple navigation it feels like an early adopter only product…

  7. Interesting that many people seem to want “One DRM to rule them all . . . and in the darkness bind them.”

    Ok so its got the same avantages in only wanting one operating system around – but – if one or two companies control the DRM world they also control everything we can watch or read and can turn off or control any document. Surely its better to have a few so that we can pick and chose what level of control we will accept (hah hah yes I know you want all your content free . . .) and so control of the world’s content is at least spread a bit.

  8. Pingback: Explorations

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.