34 thoughts on “1999-2009: How Broadband Changed Everything”

  1. I’m sure Platform as a service like PaaS applications like http://www.MyTaskHelper.com will be included in this list in the next year. I believe that all kind of online database applications/form builders, anything what makes starting online business quikly will be very improtant in 2010

  2. “which has single-handedly destroyed the long-distance voice business.”

    You sure nationwide cellphone plans didn’t kill that business? Unless you define long-distance voice business only as international calls, I don’t agree with you. I think cellphones killed long-distance.

    1. Nick

      I would urge you to look at Skype’s rise and when Cellular phone companies announced flat rate plans. It was a long after Skype became a major irritant for phone companies.

      It is just that it became a deflationary factor in the phone business which has lead to everything you see. I think the companies I presented in the post above represent that “big change” unleashed by broadband “that deflated” current incumbents’ “monopolies.”

      1. I wouldn’t know where to look to find that kind of data. So I’m only basing my opinion on my experiences. But I remember cell phones w/ free long distance my first year of college in 2001 being ubiquitous among the students. They had to be because all of your friends’ cell phones had area codes from all over the country.

        Skype came around in what, 2003-2004?

        (I am not talking about flat rate plans that allow unlimited calling. I am talking about cell phone plans that had free long distance. And I believe those plans which were widespread by 2001 if not earlier killed long distance charges from landlines. I understand and agree with the overall point of your article. I just think Skype had little to do with the death of domestic long distance phone calls.

        I would agree Skype/VoIP was a large factor for international calls though. I lived outside the US in 2005-2006 and all the Americans I knew used Skype, VoIP phones or calling cards that I assumed used a VoIP component to connect the call. I don’t know anyone who kept in touch with their families landline to landline.)

      2. Nick’s timeline is correct. Same experience here: Cell phones plans with included long distance exploded around 2000.

        Back then, everyone I knew who had a cell phone tended to use it for long distance more, since it was included in more and more plans. E.g., folks would wait till the off-peak period to make those cross-country calls.

        The phone companies began aping this soon after. I distinctly remember MCI’s Neighborhood plan coming out in 2002 or 2003, claiming to be the first to offer both local and long distance calls calling for a single monthly fee, cell-phone style. (TV ads featured some Michael McDonald song…)

        Then, of course the VOIP boom rounded this off, especially with Vonage helping to push this into the mainstream by popularizing the “real phone” feel — versus the computer + headset thing that dominated the early days of VOIP.

    2. Nick

      Just because it is the holidays I am going to find that data for you — WP really needs to improve search in its system — and share that with you.

      I appreciate your counter arguments — they are making me re-think and of course become more rigorous in my view on Skype. Thanks

    3. Cell phones definately killed domestic long distance for most people. In fact, many people who said they didn’t overly want a cell phone got one just so they could use free nights and weekends.

      For international calls, though, VoIP in general has made long distance a distant memory. For me it’s Vonage World, but for many others Skype was the service that let them drop calling cards and every other form of old fashioned long distance. Hey, my first experience with international VoIP calls was with Dialpad.com in 2000; quality over an internet cafe’s ISDN connection was pitiful, but it was a glimpse of the future.

  3. @Om,

    You may touch on these points in parts 2 and 3, but mobile broadband will likely expand upon all of the points you highlighted. Mobile broadband, or wireless broadband as I prefer to call it, is ushering in a “connected lifestyle” where we’ll access info and services via a wide array of devices. Wired broadand is accessed primarily via computers, and therefore has had vast but constrained broadband adoption. Wireless broadband floats the Internet into the clouds. 😉

    My $.02.

    Happy Holidays!

  4. It is not “democracy,” but rather anarchy, that has aided the development of companies like Skype and also has allowed Google to obtain a monopoly on online advertising.

    You write: “At the same time, I find it absurd that so many companies blame Google for their woes. It’s not Google that has so little regard for esteemed brands, but the distribution platform — aka the broadband network.”

    The woes caused by Google which are of concern are not the destruction of “esteemed brands,” but rather the implementation, by government, of policies that harm the public for Google’s benefit. For example, the “network neutrality” regulation being lobbied for by Google and its minions in DC (many of which claim not to be doing it on behalf of Google but actually receive funding or in-kind support from it) is not neutral at all; its purpose is to destroy or harm other companies while helping Google. (This publication, which apparently receives most of its revenue from Google advertising, alas has an irreparable conflict of interest and may in fact be deterred from speaking up about this problem because it would be out of business if it lost the advertising. Is this why both Google and YouTube, and not their competitors, are touted above?) In any event, Google has gotten so big and rich that it can devote millions to such practices (according to opensecrets.org, it gave nearly $1 million to the Obama presidential campaign alone). We must be quite concerned about this influence going forward.

    1. What do you exactly mean Brett that “other companies will be destroyed” and how? OH i see – you mean the fat slow moving monopolist dinosaurs that wont have all the food to chew on as they have been doing for decades? If America followed your infinite wisdom we will all be still driving Ford Model A and only drinking Cola. Move over please – the world has got business to do.

      1. Dead wrong. It’s the “monopolist dinosaurs” that are most likely to survive the regulations proposed by Google. It’s new, innovative companies — which Google sees as a threat — that are most likely to be killed. Which is the point, actually. Google doesn’t want to see an upstart rise from a garage to challenge it.

  5. Great article. I went to Uni just before the advent of the internet and oh how tough researching was! Now it’s so easy and wondrous just how much information is freely available. Now we need to decide what goals we have in our lives and direct our access to information based on this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.