44 thoughts on “Apple + Google = Worries For Everyone”

  1. Of course, Bill Campbell (Intuit) has been on the board for quite some time and it really hasn’t helped improve the Mac version of Quicken much other than they still produce the version. So, all this could turn out to be nothing. I’m hoping not but only time will tell.

  2. Pingback: inside looking out
  3. Pingback: Tech Beat
  4. Mark my words, here comes the Google iPod phone. Possibly skype enabled and very myspace hapi hapi joy joy (music + social = lots of sales)

  5. We can hope that this portrays a closer relationship between the two companies, an aggressive push against Microsoft, and lots of great Google-branded Mac OS X software, but I think its less obvious. Don’t forget that Larry Ellison didn’t exactly make Mac OS X the best Oracle machine on the planet in his time on the board.

  6. Apple OSX + Google Open Source?

    A Microsoft Office replacement is all we need before they go on and focus entirely on the social scene.

  7. Yipee! Apple’s sexy devices and great user interface married to Google’s powerful and scalable engine…we expect beautiful children:)

    Ultimately, it’s a brand war: two brands with a base of extremely loyal customers and a reputation for originality/innovation

    versus Microsoft, whose “only-using-you-because-the-office-says-so” users have been exposed to endless Windows crashes and “let’s-copy-them-I-want-to-own-that-market” stance.
    Arrogant employees and chair throwing CEOs don’t help either.

  8. Eric Schmidt is a great choice for a board seat at Apple, but I wouldn’t jump to conclusions about where that might lead each company.

    Several months ago there was a big joint press conference between Google and Sun Microsystems. Eric Schmidt was formerly CTO of Sun so the speculation was that they would cooperate on several levels, perhaps releasing a special version of StarOffice to compete with Microsoft. The speculation was wrong and the press conference was basically a non-event.

    The best partnerships, and the best mergers, are customer driven, where customers demand and pay big bucks for products from two separate companies but want them to work together seamlessly. On the other hand, it rarely works when two companies decide to cooperate on something and then try to create customer demand for it.

    Both Google and Apple have great businesses, but I don’t see where Google sales people are dying to work with Apple sales people…or Sun sales people.

  9. You guys in the Valley are full of hubris. Not only is Quicken no longer going to be supported on the Mac (despite Bill Campbell’s Board seat), but what did Larry Ellion’s Apple Board Seat (dating back to the late 1990s) ever accomplish? Oh, maybe we got Oracle 10G on Mac OS X Server (big whip in the era of open source databases such as PostgreSQL and MySQL).

    How has Apple gained from having Al Gore on the Board besides seeing Al’s PowerBook all over the place in his Global Warming documentary?

    Om Malik, you should be taking the inverse perspective and be viweing this as a defensive move by the old boys in the Valley to yet again try to fend off Microsoft. Even if Zune is not a home run, they know that MSFT was able to hit a home run with Xbox. Furthermore, I don’t frankly believe that Schmidt knows how to grow Google’s business beyond its core competency which is search engine and advertising sales (both of whcih are not infinite — at some point there is an end and then Wall St. will ask “what next?”).

    Google does not have the creative genius human interface Zen that Steve Jobs offers. Plain and simple. This to me looks like Google doing what they can to make sure they survive in a world that has seen Microsoft eat past Valley companies for lunch (including Netscape).

    Oh yes Mr. Malik you are forgetting one very important thing. The Valley has become weaker to defend itself against Redmond because of the demise of Sun / McNealy. Oh sure, they got some money out of Bill for Java but in the long haul it doesn’t matter (Microsoft will eat up Java with .NET and C# — even Microsoft is building Python and Ruby into their CLR development tools). Its clear from Ruby on Rails that Java will eventually erode over the coming decade(s).

    This is the fight of Google’s life so why not join Apple which has everything going for it?

  10. Please folks, it’s quite obvious what will happen.
    Google and Apple will eventually merge, form Goople, and then take over the world.

  11. eddie,

    you bring up interesting points, and so does, don dodge. I think this is not the kind of bluster you would expect from scott mcnealy of the old.

    these two companies can craft a commercial relationship in which both can make money. it is a damn good reason to collaborate. not the sound-and-fury of mcnealy-larry ellison.

    these two companies are at the top of their game in search and digital media respectively. by working together, they are ensuring that they are hanging on to the top spot, and they have to.

    talking about quicken, i still have it on my mac, so not quite sure if that is really relevant to this discussion.

    still, your points are very valid and worth noting. thank you for sharing them with us. I appreciate such intelligence from my readers, who always try and keep it real for me, and for rest of us.

  12. Don,

    you are right in bringing up the Sun-Google hoopla. The situation as I explained in the previous comment, is different.

    Sun as a company does not have the clout in the industry, and doesn’t enjoy the leadership position. that deal ultimately was google getting a presence on browsers on sun machines. they got their tool bars in, and well, sun really did not have much to offer.

    i think this time around the two companies can make money for each other – that is pretty good motivation.

    Of course, you are right that customer driven deals are always good. from that perspective, safari users have been seamlessly using google. why not the other way around – google users finding music that works with a device that has a major share of the digital music market.

  13. Eddie’s points about Xbox being a hit also resembles some of the other core areas that Microsoft has finally made some stride. For example- the smartphone and PDA industry. I believe that Microsoft’s Zune initiative may not be a big hit in the first chance, but these guys are known as guys with lots of patience and determination. So, there is a chance that Zune product line after some revisions will be competitive enough to match ipods and any other music devices in future.

    So, in that context, the Google/Apple partnership (if it comes out due to Eric Shmidt’s role in Apple’s board) may be helpful to maintain a competetive lead over Microsoft in near future.

  14. In response to Om’s comment, “Bill’s boys are going to spend their enormous hoard of cash to buy into the digital media – music, movies and whatever – space. No one can outspend Microsoft, but one can outsmart them…”, I’d like to note that none of the aforementioned players have yet purchased the golden carrot…”NetFlix”.

    NetFlix doesn’t have the whorish reputation of Blockbuster (they weren’t in the game early enough to pimp out bogus late fees).

    IF Microsoft moves at a tangible asset such as Netflix, whether through partnership or saturatino, not only would they obtain library rights, but a much more covetted asset that they have long desired…A Positive Reputation.

  15. OK. I love google … I like they way their contribution to digital media… why not, let’s make everything googleized.

  16. Health competition is all we need as consumers. When they compete we get the products at a lower prices.

    Indeed Google is a treat to microsoft and Bill knows it. These guys are cable of doing anything and for free in name of open source.

  17. This is terrible news.

    Schmidt’s no Mac user, that’s obvious at a glance. Where are his tattoos? His piercings? He’s probably never been in a threesome or done a speedball in his life. The guy’s practically a walking PC. What a dweeb!

    Mark my words: Schmidt’s appointment to the board marks the beginning of the end. He will destroy Apple from the inside out. Just wait and see.

  18. If Google would plan to support Mac platfrom more actively, if would be more logical to let his Stevenss on Google board, not vice versa. If any changes come, this means that Google’s Web expertise gonna be used for Apple’s good. It means revamped .Mac.

    There were lot of discussion about .Mac recently here on GigaOm, so I am surprised noone came up with this idea in comments above 🙂

  19. Pingback: OberData
  20. Pingback: eucap
  21. Has anyone though that Google is planing on developing a worldwide wifi network that will offer free access with adverts and paid without the partnership with Apple will allow the next generation wifi enabled Ipod to use the network thus creating a new income stream for both companies you can also bet your anything that Google will ask for finance from Apple to further increase there wifi network faster.

    Remember Google also invested in a wifi company some time ago.

    read more on my blog…

  22. Pingback: IP Democracy
  23. Well it would be nice if the google services worked with Safari. Currently many of these don’t work at all or only at substandard levels. Even GMail only works in a basic model in Safari.

  24. I second Anvarzhon’s comment… that’s exactly what I was thinking. If Google is king of web-based apps, let the pod-king build the thin client for it. And considering the Google-Ebay association, could this mean fewer degrees of separation for iChat and Skype?

  25. IMO, Google could forge partnerships with just about anyone in the industry and strengthen their business somehow. They are king of web advertising and that goes a long way.

    On the flip, every successful company knows that Google is a powerful service and is smart to jump on their wagon.

  26. It means exactly nothing between Apple and Google. It is Schmidt who has been elected to the board, not “the CEO of Google”. That’s an important difference.

    In fact, as I understand the way, way, way complicated laws of Sarbanes-Oxley and the like, if Schmidt was to be seen to have an influence on a Google-Apple relationship, that would be a very naughty, SEC-coming-down-on-you-like-a-ton-of-bricks conflict of interest

  27. Well, the .Mac angle suggested above is interesting enough to mull on its own, actually. It’s obviously too Mac-centric to have general impact, but I think it’s going to generate a lot of wishful thinking.

    Heck, even I started doing it…

  28. Personally, I tend to agree about the dot-Mac thing.

    Consider people appointed to the board. Al Gore knows alot about government purchasing, having changed the system while Vice President. And there’s the guy from J. Crew, who knows alot about retail operations.

    So one possibility is that Schmidt is there to try to sort out Apple’s online strategies in regards to iTunes, iPhoto, dot-Mac, etc.

  29. Pingback: Preboot

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.