29 thoughts on “AT&T to Allow VoIP Calls Over 3G Network; Skype Fans Rejoice”

  1. Is this proof that you don’t necessarily need net neutrality regulations to start moving the market? Chalk one up for the FCC’s “bully pulpit,” as well as the Verizon-Google Voice announcement today.

    1. Agreed. I am pretty impressed by how quickly this has come to pass. Now if we could get some equal amount of competition into the broadband market, things would be cool.

    2. NO! This is just proof that the mere threat of net neutrality regulation can produce SOME result. Imagine how much more might happen if neutrality rules were actually on the books & there was real competition!

  2. “AT&T says it will soon allow Apple’s iPhone to make VoIP telephony calls over its 3G network.”

    Whoa. Whoa!

    Om, I thought you said AT&T had nothing to do with Google Voice being rejected?

  3. Om, QOS over 3G via iPhone apps doesn’t have to suck, at least not all the time 😉 If the signal is decent, there is really no reason why the call experience could not be on par or potentially even better than cellular calls. I have an iPhone SMB communications project underway that should help to prove this out.

    1. My friend tried a skype 3g call on a old htc winmo phone (the tilt) on ATT 3g (funny how WinMo is more open) . Anyway the quality sucked big time. And from the looks of it the processor matters quite a bit for a low bandwidth connection like 3G.

      The iPhone 3GS has a nice processor, so we may have better luck now, but then the quality of data on the At&T network has only degraded so we may not be so lucky.

    1. Allowing VoIP, and general “openness” was going to be a big competitive advantage of all Android phones, so Android loses some advantage vs.iPhones.

      Though I agree with you. I think that Google will be happy. Their disruptive introduction of Android is opening up the whole market, so their apps will have more freedom on iPhones, as well as Android phones. That just means more advertising revenues for them.

      Apple forced carriers to be more open than they had been. Now Android is forcing Apple to be more open then they had been. The ratchet effect of competition is working in the right direction.

      Consumers: a big win for competition. I love to watch ATT/Apple square off against all comers. Both sides must keep getting better, or lose ground. These are awesome times.

  4. Why is that when a company decides something which is favorable to the consumers (and contrary to our expectations), we put our cynic hat on and say things like ‘I bet today’s decision was promoted by the tough stance taken by the FCC.’ Maybe that is true but at least commend their stance – they stand to loose out a lot due to this for our gain. I bet AT&T would be looking at this blog post and saying – “It’s a cynical world we are living in. If we do things right we don’t get applauded and if we do things wrong we are criticized!”

    Om –> Give credit where it is deserved.


  5. This is great news, kudos to AT&T for allowing something which should have been okay one day one. Competition is a good thing. Now if AT&T would allow the Sling Player app on the iPhone to work over the network.

  6. Great!!!! Congrates for all the iPhone consumers.I think it would be better to use the VoIP telephony facility using apple’s iPhone. Now it would be tought to compete for the PSTN VoIP providers with this.
    Thanks to AT & T.

  7. I have a couple of concerns regarding the proliferation of Skype.

    Firstly (and most importantly) CallerID. I simply won’t accept a call where the CallerID is not presented. As a number of friends start to use Skype more and more, the number of calls presenting with a CLI of is increasing. Not a good thing. This could be remedied by ‘spoofing’ the CallerID by Skype (subject to knowing and validating originator’s number) or assigning a Skype VOIP number to each user which is routed with the call (especially when it finally emerges from VOIP land to POTS world).

    Secondly, I would prefer, where a call is initiating on Skype’s network that it would be answered by a Skype client on the iPhone (kinda gets around the above issue). That way I could identify callers by their Skype username and include their details in my contacts/address book. Ability to background Skype.app anyone?

    Finally – a unified Contacts Manager is what is really the next step. And I suspect that Apple’s sweetheart deal with the operators is going to potentially blindside them to the impact of this. I love the SMS (Messages) app on the iPhone. But why doesn’t a contact view have a page to review ALL forms of contact in order (irrespective of type). By this I mean a log of Calls (In/Out), SMS/MMS (sent/received), Emails (sent/received), IMs (in the same fashion as SMS). All with a common ‘contact’ API that allows any iPhone app to register a Contact Record and link to a contact. For that matter why can’t I link a task to a contact? Or a Note? Or even a set of photos?

    I’ve been more than tempted to write a Mac OS app which scans the (simple) sqlite db’s in the iPhone backup bundles and appends call logs, sms logs and email snippets to the bottom of the contact’s notes fields.

    Why can’t I bring up a contact and see when I last phoned/emailed them? Or them me..

    Enough of that. I love my iPhone. But it could be so much more.

    Gerard Byrne

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.