Korea’s Penguin-la

6 thoughts on “Korea’s Penguin-la”

  1. I always hate similar attempts to force using technologies by government body. There are a lot of failed projecrs in Europe which used this approach. I understand that Asia can be other case but anyway. Nothing said about commercial efficacy. Nothing said about total costs of this trnasformation. Nothing said about exit plan in case of failure. Only political aims. What they choose isnt a better software but platform for development of their software industry. Were Microsoft korean corporation, nothing would happen. This is neither victory of Linux nor direct failure of MS

    “… through the showcasing of Linux as the major operating system without any technical glitches and security issues”
    They are kidding or what?

  2. While I agree with EQ2 plat on the whole, it is also always good to see larger organizations (be that government, corporations, or otherwise) realize that Windows and Office isn’t the only option out there. I like to see that these people know about Linux and are willing to experiment. Let’s just hope they have thought it out properly first.

  3. A couple of points to address any implication that this step is ‘risky’:

    1. Asianux by Korean company Haansoft has already been deployed on thousands of servers in Korea.

    2. Haansoft’s desktop Linux & Hancom Office products have already been deployed on 120,000+ Korean Government PCs

    3. Asianux Linux from Haansoft has already been certified and deployed by IBM, HP, Oracle and others in Korea.

    Thus, it is important not to extrapolate a U.S. market-centric view of the world onto activities in other parts of the world, especially Asia.

    Greetings from Australia > frank

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.