MTV+Real+Verizon Vs. Apple & iTunes

10 thoughts on “MTV+Real+Verizon Vs. Apple & iTunes”

  1. If you added up the marketshare of all the Windows DRM based services, it would total what – a mere 10%? These guys are fighting for table scraps and teaming up together to lower costs and up their perceived marketshare. Yes, in one fell swoop, MTV’s Urge went from 0.5% marketshare to 3% by teaming up with Real and you can spin it as a 600% marketshare gain or you can see it for what it really is: the last desperate act of survival for a failing venture.

    Next up on GigaOm, Napster reports profits after laying off 99% of it’s staff.

  2. I can access my Rhapsody library over the web, from the full-client jukebox, from my Sansa R, in my house via Sonos (without a pc), and soon over Tivo. For $15 per month. I also own two current generation ipods and 15k tracks. My point is that not everyone is looking to these services to replace itunes/ipod. Some of us use them to more easily do the things apple has not offered (celestial jukebox, subscription model, etc.).

  3. As noted above “three losers don’t make a winner”. How many more millions must be wasted by “me too” executives. Get over it; Apple got it right. MTV/Viacom, you teenie-bopper demographic isn’t going to pay for your content. Verizon, spend your dollars wisely (read: get a deal favorable for you and Apple, bringing the iPhone online to your network). It’s really ridiculous (and quite sad, frankly) that this continues. I’m all for competition, but I see nothing new here. Meanwhile, Real tries to remain relevant. Sorry, but you know it’s true.

  4. A joint venture of MTV, Real and Verizon would be formidable competition for anyone, including Apple iTunes. This is a huge market, for online music, and investment can run very large because of the potential revenues. GD.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.