36 thoughts on “Slide Cuts Ad Staff, Shifts Focus”

  1. Om you’re too close to these fools. Slide was doomed to fail. Just come out and say it hombre.

    1. One thing $58 million does – buys you a lot of time to change business models and figure out a way. I think it is not just Slide but all of these companies that have raised a ton of cash and are CPM based are going to be facing crunch time: when they do, they would all need to figure out a new revenue model. Will it work? Who knows….

      1. Om

        I agree with you on this point. It is also worth noting that Levchin has a strong track record of making the strategic shifts necessary to succeed as in early stage technology company – or, in the words of Andreessen, the shifts necessary to achieve Product-Market fit.

        PayPal is a case in point where, as Confinity, they initially focused on infrared payment transfers between Palm Pilots. When the market for this service turned out to be negligible, the management team shifted strategy to focus on email payments, which were generating early traction. There is no reason to believe that Levchin is not capable of making the strategic shifts required for Slide to succeed.

      2. It also puts pressure on you to build a business that can exit for well north of $500m. Is Slide really a $1b company?

        And was it really that hard to figure out that by taking that much money the lower margin smaller campaigns wouldn’t be the way to build a $1b company? If not, then why build that business and then abandon it?

        We have a habit of praising CEOs who make ‘strategic shifts’ without looking at the decision making process that led to the shift. In the meantime people who were hired based on the previous model are out of work in a touch economy.

    2. slide never really had a business plan or out look….the are always looking over their heads and doing what RockYou did. it was a simple cut and copy on their front. paypal was a one hit wonder like hotmail was for the founders…just pack up and move to some island. i agree with the above comment…OM you are getting to close with some of he firms that you cover….do some real analysis and competitive analysis on some of these companies and look at their business model which is nothing more then cut and past…cover real tech firms.


    Good to see they have switched models, but you should know your business to be valued at that much money

  3. Om – good story. Do you think they are focusing more on virtual items / premium content revenue from their games? Zynga has seemingly left Slide in the dust by focusing on consumer-driven game revenue instead of ad revenue.

    1. I would have thought so, but it seems like this change of focus is still on getting premium advertising. I think in the end their revenue will have to go towards virtual goods but the company needs to make more products that are virtual goods oriented. so newer apps that really are games.

      1. om,

        CPM models are unsustainable as well. but virtual goods is just kicking the can down the road?

      2. Sounds like a pipe dream in this market. $50k deals keep the lights on and are the foundation to nearly all online ad publishers bottom line. Publishers need to prove their VALUE/ROI before they can ask for a Budget north of $250k. The $500k Brand deals are being sold as Integrated TV/Web sponsorships. Apps are everywhere and Slide’s market share is shrinking as users download the “App Du Jour”. More Apps equal more Supply and Demand isn’t even close.

        Good Luck Slide-you need it.


  4. Not a good sign when your $50,000 ad sales aren’t high margin enough.

    Om – is it really a *margin* problem or is it purely a revenue problem? There simply aren’t enough advertisers who want to spend $50k full price ads. You can get lousy CTR anywhere and just pay pennies.

  5. Om,

    Can’t believe the valuation for a company still looking to prove its model. As we have discussed several times, the way out of the CPM downward spiral is not with more inventory, even if it is “better”. Consumers don’t want ads period. And as Ali points out,it is about connecting with consumers in new engaging ways –games, game mechanics, virtual goods etc.that are relevant and actually liked by consumers. That’s at least where we are putting our bets, and seeing effective CPM’s through the roof. To get it right the consumer needs to win, not just the companies who push more and more crappy ads at them.

  6. When we talk about the valuation, remember it’s a VC valuation from an investment 18 months ago (Jan ’08). We were much closer to the FB app mania and, well, the world looked a lot different then.

  7. If they are going to focus on the higher-value, non-IAB units why get rid of the entire ad sales team?

  8. I heard from an insider Slide is making Zynga-like money on virtual gift sales. Was this person truly in the know, I’m not sure, but a current update on Slide’s run rate and top performing sectors would be v. v. interesting. RockYou too. Think you can get it Om? I think you can 😉

  9. Om,

    Let’s face it, this is a stupid move – Slide is nothing but ubber commodity inventory —- anything that runs off facebook pretty much is….wish Max would stop sticking his nose up at this fact and actually accept it. Slide is not worth $500M. They’ll be lucky if they got 10M for that business – getting valued like facebook and then taking a significant down round is where I see this going.

  10. Om, Interesting article overall, but there must be more to this story than appears here. @Bill above is right: there is a “hole” in both the story and their stated logic as regards cutting their sales force. Either they didn’t think their current team could ramp from $50k deals to $500k+ deals [not likely], they think they can ‘bypass’ the $50k deals on their way to $500k deals [not at ALL likely], or the stated reason was a cover for some other reason, or direction yet to be revealed.

    I also agree with both @Jimbo-NYC, and @mikesimonsen on the “margin” issue. Having worked with two Social Media startups in the past 1.5 yrs, very, very, very few clients in this climate are going to dream of signing off on a $500k ‘sponsorship’ for something that is not proven, tested, locked & loaded. Those $50k deals ARE the stepping-stone to $500k deals. So unless Slide gives such iron-clad ‘performance guarantees’ to that client at $500k that its nearly a giveaway…that “margin” they thought would be ‘higher-value’, ends up dramatically LESS than the original one on the $50k deals to begin with [on a % basis.]

    If Max has already proven he can do what is stated here to his Board, he should also sell the ad programs himself, as a Maestro. If not, one can only wonder what their Board was thinking when they heard this kind of “logic”…?

    From the top, there must be more to this story, somewhere.

    Ken Nicholas

  11. It’s obvious Slide has failed. Levchin was a one hit wonder. He entered Facebook at the right time when apps were just being introduced but made fatal mistakes in leveraging and converting all that traffic into a real and sustainable business model. The 500K business model focus sounds like another mistake. Max is a techie not a business person and therein lies most of the problem. He should step aside and let someone else run the company and he can focus on product. Fail.

  12. Interesting article. Advertising seems to be trending with the overall media dilution from Online. I like to watch innovators in the space. I found one the other day call AdCandy. I think it is http://www.adcandy.com. There are a ton of targetted and specific sites out there to get the message out beyond tradtional means.

    Keep up the great insight.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.