The Great Cable Bandwidth Debate

6 thoughts on “The Great Cable Bandwidth Debate”

  1. Does cable have a problem right now? Only if Wall Street starts to get worried about capex required soon.

    Will they have a problem in the future? Of course.

  2. Of course they will have problems in the future, but that is if they sit and do nothing. I don’t think these guys are going to sit still. they have time on their side, and hopefully that will be enough for them to take rear guard action.

  3. But will Wall Street view any big investment well? They have been telling the street that they were done for quite a while. What happens when they have to not only explain why they will beat Verizon and AT&T as new competitors, while also having to invest bigtime (again) or try to compete with inferior technology?

    Then again, maybe by waiting, new advances come quicker, pricetags get smaller. Verizon is going all in, AT&T just called the small blind, taking a wait and see view, and it will be interesting to see how it all turns out.

  4. I’m not so sure if ‘Upgrades are inherently cheaper than building a new network from ground up’.
    In the Netherlands a big cablecompany (Essent) announced it would test etth, with fiber to streetcabinets and from thereon to the premises the old coax. 100 Mbps symmmetrical should be possible. But at what cost? 400 euro (500 US $) per house passed.
    In the small town of Hillegom a company valled Lijbrandt has rolled out ftth to some 7500 houses. At 1200 euro per house passed. 100 mbps symmetrical to start with, 1000 Mbps possible at hardly no extra cost.
    With hdtv and 3D-tv coming up, 100 Mbps is not enough.
    Essent recently got new owners, who paid some 1400 euro per subscriber for the cablenetwork. That’s more then a new fibernetwork now costs. Add to that 400 euro for upgrading to a network that still isn’t what ftth delivers.
    Who’s the fool out here?
    Vincent Dekker, telco journalist at the Dutch daily Trouw

  5. Obviously the cablecos will have to upgrade at some point, just as Verizon will eventually have to upgrade from PON to an active network, the real question is when. Based on AT&T’s unabitous Lightspeed and Verizon’s (not Wireless) traditional desire to squeeze as much out of the customers as possible for slight incremental imporvements, I’d say the cableco’s have 5 years before they need to spend big (i.e. when there is a need to offer > 100 Mbps). 5 real-life years is like 100 Wall Street years (or Tech years, or Telecom years, for that matter). Wake me in 2010 when this is a real story.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.