17 thoughts on “Webaroo and Web2Go”

  1. I think this is one of the also ran ideas among a host of others in the bubble 2.0. This only seems useful to users who like to be “connected” at all times and such users are generally savvy enough to subscribe to hotspots or cellular data services while the average joe at whom this service is targeted wouldnt care anyways.

    I also expect this service to run into legal hassles. You had posted an article yesterday of Veoh hoarding content not belonging to them. This software seems to be built along similar lines. no ?

  2. dascud,

    i think you are right about that it could get into legal hassles. my guess is there will be a lot of people up in arms about it, but the fair use arguments will hold. now this is just a guess. i have not heard anything otherwise!

  3. This can actually be of a lot more value in developing nations where internet connectivity is still far from ubiquitous. The target market may be smaller in such nations, but if you think of a large number of mobile devices users in parts of Asia like India (where internet connectivity is still spreading slowly and cell phones are predominantly access devices) this might really come in handy. The Acer partnership makes a lot more sense from this perspective. I am not sure how effective this might be in the US, though I have experienced a need for this a few times. The legal aspects seem critical though.

  4. I think this is a bad idea and has no future.. People are talking about webtops, and you still insist on offline content packing…

  5. sounds like a bad idea, that does not deserve the ink its getting.

    when so much of the web is interactive, catering to an offline world does not sound like a very attractive business idea.

    good luck with the business plan.

  6. Back in 1995, I started a company called Milktruck that had a Web utility that cached the web sites of your choice. For the best web sites, we were pretty smart about what we got. For instance, for the NYTimes, we knew where all the day’s stories were located and got them (rather than the about or search pages).

    We were bought by Traveling Software (makers of LapLink and interested in all things mobile). The product won all sorts of awards; we tried to sell it at $40 a piece (this was still early in Web development, so selling thru CompUSA seemed reasonable). But people wouldn’t buy.

    Since then, I’ve seen offline-browsing utilities come and go and none has stuck. While I really want someone to solve this problem well, I don’t think enough people want it.

    As for the legal issues: as long as people use it for personal use, it was fair use. I do not know for sure, but if WebaRoo is packaging and then redistributing, then it may be a grayer issue.

  7. I can see some interesting titles:

    “Thousands of things you cannot, but wish you could, do w. Webaroo!!”

    “Startup attracts invesment to repackage a failed Internet Explorer feature introduced ages ago …”

    “Webaroo: Internet for people who drink decaf!”

    Just having a little fun … silly idea, but wish them the best 🙂

  8. So I have to know ahead of time what I will need to search…I agree with most of the posts…an also ran idea that 3-G networks, and free city Wi-Fi roll outs will obviate…

  9. Webaroo has many interesting idea.
    1. It allows you to take the website of your choice offline apart from their own created web packs.
    2. The website can be auto-updated hence you are always with the latest contents. Always with you wherever you are.

Leave a Reply to Vaibhav Domkundwar Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.