Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us

75 thoughts on “Why I have issues with Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us”

        1. Actually, it often costs more to employ a foreign worker than a U.S. worker. The employer is bound by salary requirements set forth by the DOL and the fees involved with the visa process as well as getting a green card process add even more to the tally. Ther eis also more liability involved. Employing foreign workers is not a first option for most Silicon Valley tech companies, it is a fallback.

          1. That may be true for direct employment, but most foreign workers that are here (in IT roles) are under the umbrella of a “consulting” company and are substantially cheaper than an American worker, direct or 1099.

            That’s the point of having them in. It isn’t because of some perception at the CIO level that Indian consultants are better than Americans. It’s the money.

          2. Just thought I would come back and respond to this as I think you misrepresent how this process works with regard to technology professionals. Third party contractors are still obligated by the same salary requirements for the region/city in which a foreign national is employed. If a sponsoring employer listed on an H-1B ignores these rules, they are breaking the law. Of course these scenarios do exist; there will always be abuses of the law. But abuses are the exception, not the norm.

            You comment that “It’s the money” that drives this illegal practice of underpaid foreign born professionals. Of course it’s the money! The flow of skilled workers facilitates the making of money. Without Engineers from around the world, the U.S. would not be the technology leader that it is today. But to say foreign workers in the technology sector are paid less on the whole than U.S. workers in the same sector ignores the problems companies have meeting the salary requirements set forth by the government wherein a foreign worker is often required to make more than their U.S. counterpart. This is a daily occurrence of which I have first hand experience. Based on this information, I think U.S. workers have more of a right to make the claim “It’s the money” as it seems the skilled workers from our own soil is valued at less than a foreign worker. Please stop spreading nonsense.

          3. It is you who is spreading nonsense. Here’s why:

            “Third party contractors are still obligated by the same salary requirements for the region/city in which a foreign national is employed.”

            There are multiple loopholes in the H-1B visa laws that allow employers to LEGALLY pay H-1B beneficiaries below market wages. Here are just some of them:

            1) The prevailing wage is based on a broad job description and not the WORKER. Consider this example: The prevailing wage levels for OES occupation code 15-1132.00 which is “Software Developers, Applications” are:

            Level 1 Wage:$34.26 hour – $71,261 year
            Level 2 Wage:$42.02 hour – $87,402 year
            Level 3 Wage:$49.77 hour – $103,522 year
            Level 4 Wage:$57.53 hour – $119,662 year

            The Department of Labor defines the skill levels as:

            – Level I: (entry) wage rates are assigned to job offers for beginning level employees who have only a basic understanding of the occupation. These employees perform routine tasks that require limited, if any, exercise of judgment. The tasks provide experience and familiarization with the employer’s methods, practices, and programs. . . . Statements that the job offer is for a research fellow, a worker in training, or an internship are indicators that a Level I wage should be considered.

            – Level II: (qualified) wage rates are assigned to job offers for qualified employees who have attained, either through education or experience, a good understanding of the occupation….

            – Level III: (experienced) wage rates are assigned to job offers for experienced employees who have a sound understanding of the occupation and have attained, either through education or experience, special skills or knowledge. . . . Words such as ‘lead’ (lead analyst),
            ‘senior’ (senior programmer), ‘head’ (head nurse), ‘chief’ (crew chief), or ‘journeyman’ (journeyman plumber) would be indicators that a Level III wage should be considered.

            – Level IV: (fully competent) wage rates are assigned to job offers for competent employees who have sufficient experience in the occupation to plan and conduct work requiring judgment and the independent evaluation, selection, modification, and application of standard procedures and techniques….

            Do you see anything in those levels to account for the fact that an H-1B worker may have a masters degree? No premium for a masters over a bachelors? Do you see anything in those levels to account for hot skills, like Android development over, say, Cobol development? Workers with hot skills and higher education levels should be paid a premium, yet the prevailing wage levels do not take those things into account.

            Level One represents about the 17th percentile of wage average Americans earn. ABOUT 80% of LCAs are filed at this 17th percentile level. This four-level prevailing wage can be obtained from the DOL website, and is generally far lower than average wages.

            From Wikipedia: “The ‘prevailing wage’ stipulation is allegedly vague and thus easy to manipulate, resulting in employers underpaying visa workers. According to Ron Hira, assistant professor of public policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology, the median wage in 2005 for new H-1B information technology (IT) was just $50,000, which is even lower than starting wages for IT graduates with a B.S. degree. The US government OES office’s data indicates that 90 percent of H-1B IT wages were below the median US wage for the same occupation”

            Now, you might be saying, “Yeah, but the law requires that an employer pays H-1B non-immigrants the same wage level paid to all other individuals with similar experience and qualifications for that specific employment, or the prevailing wage for the occupation in the area of employment, whichever is higher.”, but loopholes abound. The employer can tailor the job description with such ridiculous requirements that no one would be able to fill it, thus allowing them to pay the prevailing wage.

            Sources:
            http://www.flcdatacenter.com/OesQuick.aspx
            http://www.cis.org/articles/2007/back407.html
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-1B_visa

  1. Have just spent days at hospital bedside of dying relative. Immigration is about nurses, cleaners, consultants, kitchen staff, porters. We don’t just consume virtual products, we live in a world where people2people services need as much consideration. Thanks for calling the intellectual and practical limitations of their political agenda.

  2. You are confusing immigration reform with labor market reform. Retraining or rehabilitating obsolete workers due to automation is a real issue, but it doesn’t have to be part of immigration reform. I agree that the zuck group seems to be motivated by their business interest. So, what’s wrong with that? If serving their self interest leads to viable immigration reform then so be it.

    GG

    1. Business interests frequently collide with the national interest. For instance, Zuck et al might want to recreate Foxconn in the U.S., but that wouldn’t be in the national interest.

      Zuck et al don’t want to go that far, but what they do want is not in the national interest.

    2. What if it doesn’t? Half the kids who graduate from American universities every year can’t find jobs or are underemployed. Increasingly, IT degrees are being shunned because the labor market is saturated with skilled people who can’t find jobs in those fields, while the Silicon Satraps continually scheme to import cheaper labor. How is any of that in the national interest?

      1. hehe – although i have no real plans of moving to the US I come to see that the imigration problem is ubiquitous. There is ALWAYS a suply of cheaper labor force with adequate education and/or credentials. And also a rising wave of people opposing their import. I think however it’s unstoppable. The people ARE there, they do have ideas, they WILL start businesses or help other people’s businesses grow. The only question is – do you want them to do it in the US (or Europe in my case) or let them do it in China? The downside of letting them work here is that they can offer better quality/cost ratio thus rendering some of the current citizen obsolete in the labor market. the downside of letting them work in China/Asia is that this way they will help China/Asia get a bigger and bigger share of the most profitable industry there is now – technology businesses…

  3. Lots of good thoughts here, Om – and you’re not the only critic (http://on.ft.com/10Pc2uJ). I think the mood in Washington seems to agree with you that H-1Bs and e-visas need to go hand in hand with (or even in line behind) broader, blue-collar immigration reform. As a valley journalist since the dot-com era, I’ve seen a readiness by tech execs to clamor for more H-1Bs instead of for better public-school funding… or for training and hiring older workers whose tech skills might have gotten a little rusty.

    At the same time, I think Zuck and co. are to be commended for getting into a public policy debate in a big and well-financed way. Bill Gates was well into his 40s and a billionaire many times over before he began to turn his attention to the world outside his door.

  4. I don’t know. Whenever immigration comes up, everyone goes on and on about undocumented immigration, and forgets the plight of thousands upon thousands of engineers, who are here legally and yet in a limbo. Who speaks for us? No one.

    1. Srihari… apparently you have some people speaking for you and they are pretty powerful people.

      But to follow your point, why should we not talk about undocumented immigrants? They have a plight as well, only with fewer to none of the options that someone with an IT background would have.

      Also, I may have missed this in this article, but i do not think it says we should not include reform for the high skilled immigrants. i know when i talk about reform i am talking about reform for everyone. why do have to leave any group out? doing that is wrong on many levels. there is strength in numbers.

  5. I think that people in Silicon Valley generally see information/knowledge as a solution for all problems. However, information won’t fill one’s belly. World hunger and most of the large problems facing humanity don’t exist because of a lack of information.

    In fact, the quick/easy access to information of all kinds (and varying quality) creates new, hard problems.

    In my opinion, information is overrated… and we could all do better with a little less information in our lives. The key is moderation – but that is a virtue we seem to have exchanged for pervasive computing.

  6. Basically, your article is saying:
    I don’t understand a damn about economy and about economic trends,I don’t understand why and how political lobby groups works and I think they are trying to take over the entire US economy using nothing more than ideas and a sino-mexican army of illegal workers.

  7. I don’t quite get it. Are you upset because FWD.us refocuses the immigration debate on immigrant tech workers? Are you arguing that rather than welcoming tech immigrants we should retrain our workforce? Do you think job-stealing technology should incur a displaced worker tax? What specific FWD.us policies do you dislike? Do you have a point other than “Silicon valley doesn’t understand real people’s problems”?

  8. In my opinion immigration should be tied to the unemployment rate. If unemployment is high then immigration should shrink. If unemployment is low then immigration should go up.

    Maybe I am a cynic but when I see companies say that we need more immigration I interpret it as them saying wages are too high. Aren’t these companies multinationals anyway? They can already hire talent anywhere in the world that they want to. So, I am highly suspicious of their motives.

    I think we need to make sure that everyone in the country has a chance to have a successful happy life before we bring in more people. If those conditions are being met then we can let more people in.

    1. Totally agree with you. BUT, If unemployment in a specific specialization of engineering is high, immigration for that field of specialization should reduce. For example if there are a lot of unemployed database engineers, reduce immigrants from that field. If not, then increase immigrants.

      Pegging immigration to unemployment in a general field (eg: science or engineering) is this biggest mistake.

  9. Om,

    No. On nearly everything you wrote, no.

    “I also respect the idea of education reform”.

    Fine: Go to a research university, get a technical
    Ph.D., get a tenure track professorship in a US
    research university, and then try to teach what you
    believe is missing. What’s missing? Ruby on Rails
    101? You won’t get an NSF grant or tenure for
    teaching Ruby on Rails.

    Eventually you will figure out that if Ruby on Rails
    is to be taught, then the teaching will be in a
    teaching college or a community college, not a
    research university. Next, you will discover that
    mostly people do now, and long have, learned such
    material on their own.

    So, if not something that belongs in a community
    college or just self study, what are you going to
    teach? How about Martin boundary theory in
    continuous time stochastic processes? Is that what
    you had in mind? How about attacking P versus NP?
    Want to teach something productive in that?

    Look, here in the US we’ve got the cream of all the
    world’s research universities. They are fairly well
    funded by NSF, NIH, etc. The funding and the work
    are VERY competitive. As they should be, those
    universities are working on the big stuff, not
    anything Zuckerberg or the SV VCs would understand.
    If you believe that you can do better, then go for
    it: Anyone who can knock off P versus NP will have
    their selection of chaired professorships waiting
    for them.

    Otherwise we’re talking, what, some 200 level
    courses in a CS department or just some community
    college things?

    Oh, now I understand: You want better books and
    videos. Okay, write some books. There are several
    publishers eager for better books. You believe that
    you can make a big splash writing books better than
    Knuth, Ullman, Sedgewick? Go for it! Or videos:
    Of course, the Khan videos on calculus just suck;
    Khan doesn’t understand calculus very well, but I
    do. No one should try to learn calculus from Khan.
    Instead just get a good calculus book and work
    through it carefully. The US has been awash in
    beautifully written calculus books for decades.

    Oh, you like the machine learning lectures of
    Professor Ng at Stanford and want more like that?
    You shouldn’t: Ng’s lectures are suckage. No one
    interested in quality should waste time with those.
    The really good profs at Stanford — K. Chung, D.
    Luenberger, etc. — don’t do such lectures. Instead
    they write fantastic books.

    Look, those SV VC guys are absolutely, positively
    not interested in innovation at all. They ignore
    innovation and won’t pay attention to it, read about
    it, think about it, or fund it. In SV, innovation
    and a dime won’t cover a 10 cent cup of coffee.
    Proof: Do some work that is really innovative, high
    quality original research, for a powerful, valuable
    solution to a big problem in the economy, and send
    it to the SV VCs and observe that they will totally
    ignore the work.

    Instead, SV VCs want ‘traction’ — usage or revenue
    significant and growing rapidly. So, whenever, as
    now, the SV VCs mention ‘innovation’, in fact they
    are talking about something quite different.

    “And I also applaud the efforts the group will
    devote to science and innovation.”

    You are applauding the empty set.

    Then there is the:

    “The economy of the last century was primarily based
    on natural resources, industrial machines and manual
    labor.”

    Nonsense. That economy was based heavily on how to
    use oil, iron, aluminum, steam, how to generate
    electric power, how to use electric power, plastics
    (you remember, “Plastics!”), chemistry, chemical
    engineering, mechanical engineering, civil
    engineering, electrical engineering, electronic
    engineering, radio, TV, telephone, transistors,
    computers, software, ocean going ships, autos,
    trucks, trains, airplanes, powerful piston engines,
    jet engines, rockets, satellites, optics, scientific
    instruments, nutrition, genetics, and disease
    control in agriculture, and nuclear energy.

    Looks like college dropout Zuckerberg didn’t do very
    well in 20th century economic history.

    “What that snippet from FWD.us tells me that when it
    comes to our Silicon Valley leadership, there is a
    disconnect in understanding the real world that
    exists beyond the browser or the mobile phone.”

    You praise with faint damnation: SV is in one
    hyphenated word, brain-dead, an embarrassment to the
    potential of the US, and just silly stuff in
    comparison with Terman, Shockley, Noyce, Moore,
    Viterbi, von Neumann, etc.

    “The fact is that any immigration reform needs to
    dovetail with the domestic reality of the 21st
    century America.”

    “Immigration reform”? You’ve been smoking funny
    stuff? All we need in immigration is just to
    enforce our existing laws. Then cancel the H1B
    nonsense designed to create an underclass to be
    exploited — SV slave labor.

    “Any immigration debate has to start with the
    education and re-education of the American
    workforce.”

    You HAVE been smoking funny stuff, you have, you
    have, right? Come on, Om, fess up. Admit it. I
    know there’s a lot of funny stuff in SV.

    Where’s this nonsense about ‘education’? The US is
    just awash, coast to coast, border to border, with
    nearly all the world’s best research universities
    along with, in nearly every state or town, second
    tier universities, four year colleges, community
    colleges, trade schools, etc.

    Oh, I see, you want to buy into that stuff about the
    US K-12 teaching, right? Okay: To evaluate the US
    schools, for each country of origin, say, Finland,
    Germany, France, Korea, Taiwan, compare performance
    of students with that country of origin in (A) US
    schools and (B) schools in the country of origin.
    In nearly all cases the US wins by a significant
    margin. That is, we just ‘control on country of
    origin’. Done. You have something else you want to
    see in US K-12 education?

    Look, Om, the yelling and screaming about US K-12
    education is about essentially just one thing: A
    lot of bleeding heart liberal “there but for the
    grace of God go I” efforts to get the students from
    the really poor neighborhoods up with the students
    in the suburbs.

    And the really poor neighborhoods? Sure: We wanted
    to create an exploited underclass, and we did; and
    Zuckerberg wants to create another one.

    That’s enough.

    For Zuckerberg, he’s a college dropout with poor
    technical qualifications and a poor education.
    F’get about Zuckerberg.

    Om, put down the funny stuff, f’get about the
    brain-dead SV, and look at reality.

  10. The rhetoric argument to stamp green cards for US educated students while others wait in a line for decades is flawed. This would just turn into marketing machine for US universities to lure international students while also hurting locals with high tuition. While some US universities are world class, It is a fact that all of’em don’t belong in that league.

    Immigration should have a price. And the price should be calculated based on contribution to the economy and the country.

    I write all this as someone who’s in the immigration queue.

    1. Very good point. If STEM graduates are automatically given green cards ahead of the others, the STEM universities will just become another channel for green card access. It’s stupid to have a blanket green card system for all STEM graduates. Instead, they should have a point-based merit system by which each individual’s value to the country can be gauged and that should form the main basis for providing green cards. This is what a LOT of other countries do. It’s more objective and effective than a blanket system for all STEM graduates.

  11. Om – thank you for your balanced article on this whole issue.

    For me, the biggest issue around immigration reform has been directly related to training (or the lack there of) for existing workers that technology and the economy move ahead of. It used to be, companies hired the individual and provided a learning/training path for them. These days, very few companies provide the development tracks of old, everything is pushed down to the individual. The problem with that? Training costs money, most that need training don’t realize it, and when they do there is little to no government support for such.

    The whole system, from how companies look at their everyday employees to government options on training to educating people so they understand that they need to stay abreast of things.

  12. Perhaps they (Zuck, Conway, Graham and others) believe that more (good) programmers is net positive for the country because such people will increase productivity (more units of labors per capita, which ultimately translates into more income per capita).

    Opening the doors to all immigrants in the world might decrease the productivity of the US (because the average worker in the US is way more productive than the average worker in the world), which would lead to a decrease in average salary.

    Perhaps such a free labor movement, for the world as a whole, would increase productivity. Maybe. But there’s probably a lot of other reforms in the works before we get there – in the mean time American is happy and rich (note: I’m not a US citizen).

    http://web.mit.edu/rigobon/www/Robertos_Web_Page/15.015_files/BBNN.pdf

  13. So whats really the point? That immigrants should have another lobbying group, or that there should be a lobby group around education and training – well, please go ahead and set it up. A group is doing what they believe is important to them, and so should you. Mark is not the president of the US and hence does not have to carry the burden of representing 300M people.

  14. I think that it’s a pretty transparent ruse, on behalf of Zuckerburg and gang of pro-H1b CEO shills. Just because he puts a fancy website, and they cover themselves with loft and positive sounding platitudes like “immigration” and “knowledge economy” and “globalization”, none of truly hides the fact of one thing: companies love H1b’s because they supply the companies with wage depressing serf workers. If they Zuckerburg is really into “immigration” why don’t they push to make people citizens, people that come here to work then won’t be indentured slave workers ? Why do they never address the argument that in capitalist America – where they made their millions and billions – we have supply and demand that sets the price; they want to operate here, WHILE dumping in scab replacement workers, it’s a fact. All of this bullsh*t from these liars don’t mean a damn, their aren’t any more pretend pro-H1b arguments to hide behind anymore…

  15. We need to fix immigration for skilled and semi-skilled and un-skilled. And skilled does NOT mean only those with STEM Master’s degrees. Many of the startups are built by people with English and History majors who learned to code ‘on the job’. This obsession with STEM degrees is weird.

    The startup world needs lawyers, doctors, english and history majors; and dropouts. Yes, dropouts.

    We need a sensible point based immigration reform similar to Australia and Canada that takes many factors into account. Want to work in Sacramento? +2. Want to work in Detroit? +10. Start a company? +5. Have an engg degree? +3. Have 5 years of experience? +3.

  16. I really understand your position. I believe that immigration reform across the board is needed, and I can’t believe in it more. However, personally the the immigration reform initiatives in the government for laborers are bitter-sweet to me. So many people that I know who are skilled can not live in the US and don’t have many viable options to do so. With the current proposed legislation it makes me believe that eventually there will be an upset where it will be easier to become a resident if you were an undocumented worker rather than a skilled professional. Not good.

    I find value that Zuckerberg is focusing on an area of immigration that isn’t currently in mainstream thought. If you polled americans on how they feel about immigration – their thoughts would probably be generally centered around laborers rather than skilled professionals. It can only be positive to have someone stand up for the minority of immigration cases and let their voice and stories be heard.

    1. I don’t care about non-U.S. citizens who want to enter the U.S. labor market. they can work to build up their own countries. i care about the many U.S citizens who have seen their jobs displaced, salaries lowered, and careers diminished because of cheap foreign labor. Thats what this is about. Pretending otherwise is incredibly naive and thoughtless.

  17. There is nothing wrong in this new group focusing on specific issues for specific people. Every group cannot do everything. Each company/organization focuses on certain specific areas and issues to work on. If Om wants such a comprehensive coverage of non-techies and middle America, why doesn’t he start with his own site? How much of Gigaom.com covers non-tech topics and non-coastal people/organizations? There is a reason why Gigaom.com is focused on certain specific topics. Otherwise, it would be similar to this article – a rambling piece that points all over the place without making a point. I want back the few minutes of my life I wasted reading this.

  18. The only solution for USA is to scale up…..scale up in population, services, infrastructure, knowledge, wages, values, ………. SCALE UP is the only way to success and survival, opposite is shrinking and death.

  19. Seems obvious enough to me that this “political party” is just a PAC representing people who want to save money while importing foreign engineers into the states. Their copy and its focus on “ideas” over “labor” is the best they could do to dress that up as being about more than the Valley’s money.

    1. Which is where most of the visas go, to companies like these, not individuals. That tells you all you need to know about what is really going on here.
      Does any actually expect Zuckerburg not to do something slimy like this?

  20. Let’s cut to the chase. We all need to agree to a national objective of Full Employment and do what is necessary to achieve that objective. Further more, that should be the objective in every country. Technology is part and parcel of the creation and belongs to all not just the few. Bottom line, that implies traxing high income to create jobs in the knowledge space for workers displaced by technology.

  21. You can’t solve all problems in one shot.

    This is about bringing in the talent that’s able to change the world with their ideas.

    There will always be a lot of other people that wants to come here, but their impact is none compared to what bright scientists and entrepreneurs can do.

    I think you’re missing the point Om. Let’s say we bring in a kid who’s able to create a next generation mobile device, much like apple created the iPhone, this kid creates the next big thing because he’s allowed to come and do it here, those breakthroughs, if they happen here they will create jobs for both americans and the immigrants you mention.

    Not sure why you have issues, they’re talking about one specific issue that needs to be solved so that our country can stay ahead, every day that passes the playing field gets more and more leveled and soon enough there will be no incentive to come and do your startup here.

  22. Your points are well taken @om.

    But the crux of the issue is still the need for higher-order-thinking skills in the future.
    The quantity of knowledge needed to contribute to society and the economy will keep going up. The physical and virtual worlds are beginning to intersect and a small percentage of population see that and is working towards that. A lot of us are Luddites.

    Like Alvin Toffler says, this is the information age and the knowledgeable man (or woman) is the alpha person.

  23. Look at Apple. All IT is infosys or wipro or cognizant. Cant get anything done without giving alms to these guys and so bureaucratic and inept. Then hire each other only. Its abuse and gaming the system. Major suckage working there.

  24. The USA enjoys a comparatively high-standard of living. This cannot be sustained based on previous economic models. Almost all of the formerly high-paying low-brow work has now been off-shored. Indeed, some of the unsophisticated work is being fully automated, replacing the worker entirely (domestic and overseas).

    The rank-and-file US worker is becoming increasingly less competitive in the global labor pool. Parents overseas fight for their kids to attend the best possible pre-school; our red-state citizenry clamor for their kid to become a football hero (or cheerleader).

    The social safety-net in this country has provided critical protection for those in need. But the demand on the system has become so huge that the citizens who pay into the system are balking. As the rank-and-file citizenry become less-able to obtain well-paying employment, there will be INCREASED DEMAND on the social safety-net programs. The system WILL COLLAPSE.

    Somehow, through whatever means it takes, the USA MUST drag the rank-and-file citizenry into the 21st century. They must develop skills (and a resume) that are competitive in the global job market.

    EVEN TOUGHER CHALLENGE: if we want to continue to enjoy a standard of living that is better than overseas job-competitors, then our workers need to have qualifications and efficiency-levels that are BETTER than the overseas worker. If the competency and efficiency of US workers cannot justify higher-pay, then they will NOT GET higher-pay. Our country’s standard of living will slowly decline, to match the conditions in the overseas locations. (Think of the pictures of the cattle-car-like commuter trains in India; or the Foxconn workers jumping off the roof.)

    The high-tech companies want to import workers as a means to further reduce their labor costs (and gain rapid access to talent). But it masks the aforementioned problems in our country. For the good of the citizens of the USA, it is far better that we educate/re-train our own people to qualify for these high-tech jobs.

    A couple of years ago it was greedy bankers taking advantage of the rank-and-file citizens. Now, its greedy high-tech entrepreneurs. If congress continues to give in to these greedy business people, we will dig our country into a hole from which we cannot escape. We must educate our citizens to be competitive in the 21st century global labor market.

  25. People like Mark Zuckerman, Reid Hoffman, and Eric Schmidt are just looking to hire cheap labors so they can make a bigger profit, greedy big pocket people. There are no shortage of engineer and programmers – this is bull shit. When you a show up for a job interview for a programming/engineering job there are 25+ other people applying for the same exact position. How can there be a shortage of programmers/engineers? Mark is just greedy; he is a push over sitting on his fat company (Facebook). For this reason I will never invest in his company. Hard working decent Americans can’t even find a job today. What’s wrong with America? What’s wrong with immigration? Fix it don’t be push over by the rich and powerful. It’s time to take a stand or America becomes a third world place to live.

  26. I think the mission statement is misleading. This has nothing to do with ‘keeping the US competitive’ but mostly to make sure Facebook can keep hiring people at a reasonable price once share options lose its upside.

  27. if tech jobs pay as much as derivative traders at Goldman Sachs are paid, or if Goldman Sachs derivatives traders are paid as little as Silicon Valley engineers, we’d have a big immigration wave from New York City to Silicon Valley.

  28. Has anyone else noticed that, over the past several years, “Our Man Om” has continuously improved his writing in its’ depth, breadth, style and courage.

    A.

  29. What a load of sidelining and putting ideas into the reader’s minds is this article!!

    All I feel here is the overflow of negative ideas contributing to divisive thinking between the engineering and non-engineering world. Just sad on how badly the author sidelines the problem that needs to be tackled ‘right now’ .

    Analogy : If I have a restaurant that serves bad food, its the cooks and the ingredients choosers who’d get the knife first, not the govt because they didn’t legislate pro-agricultural policies for farmers in my area. You can ‘try’ to impact something that vaguely matches your strength, nothing more, and that is what I feel Zuck and co. are attempting. The disintegrating and weakening of primary school system is well known. Recently the govt. brought out more cuts to the education system(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2013/02/statebystate.png) . I feel that point warrants more discussion rather than taking a diss at Zuck and co.

    Before enforcing positive comments on Fwd.US I’d like to ask what the author feels as possible short term solution to largely unfilled engineering/IT jobs? Almost everything is enabled by IT now, banks, finance, entertainment(IP TV- even normal tv is digitized now), schools etc, and you need people to do the work. Even if Zuck and co try/succeed in changing the education system to a little extent, they won’t be waiting for a decade for the young crop to graduate and fill in the dearth of workforce.

    The only alternative is to offshore the jobs, which yields with nothing more than half-assed monkey patched results, combined with risks including security that it adds to the table. In addition to reducing the jobs in the States, it basically does to IT what China does to products.

    In-house jobs, as opposed to offshore ones, gives two fold produce- it reduces risks including security but also adds funds for govt. in the form of taxes. I personally am seeing jobs that are unfilled in my company without it’s salary getting bloated up. In addition to what Fwd.us is trying to accomplish, the govt should take a stand to beef up education system.That is long term, just asking for visas for their industry doesn’t say they don’t know about rest of the world. Its just the same call should come from every other industry on trying to do what can/is doable to in order to get the house right. FWD.US is not trying to replace the govt. in talking from everything from education to agriculture, they are targeting a specific problem that is a sore puss to one of the biggest industry and I salute them. Don’t get me wrong, I am one of the few amongst my friends who hate Facebook on ethical(user data sales) issues.

  30. There are more than enough existing American citizens who can handle the unskilled and semi-skilled labor you are describing. There is really no need to undercut their wages by allowing more immigration by people of these skill levels–many of whom will work much more cheaply.

    High tech immigration is about getting people at the margins of intelligence and ability. The reality is that these are the people who spawn technological innovation, and having a few of those people can be the equivalent of having several dozen or hundred of unskilled and semi-skilled workers as far as economic output.

    When you are discussing quality of life, that high level of productivity per individual matters.

  31. What about the social damage when you infuse H1B workers into a community almost overnight. It’s dystopian. Look at Sunnyvale. It’s Bangalore by the Bay now. Let’s not even talk about communication. English is not the same. Sensibilities are not the same. People favor their own tribe. It’ too fast too soon to just drop a huge volume of cheap labor into the community.

  32. For a while, Mark Zuckerberg was (officially) following my blog. Big deal, I said, so was Omaha billionaire, Warren Buffett. True. I like them both for different reasons and their attention to my blog was a pride to me.
    However, when I noticed that my ‘facebook’ wall postings were moderated, without my permission or a valid notice to me as to the reasons, I yanked my facebook account.
    One more thing, my privacy was compromised.
    This kid, I mean it, not a man, needs some butt-whacking. Money makes a person famous, not wise.
    …and I am Sid Harth @elcidharth
    http://elcidharth.com

  33. Of course they’re all just typical globailist mafia who can’t stand paying American wages for engineers!!! They need to be handed a beat-down by the people and sent to prison for treason!

  34. Om,

    I totally don’t buy this. I’m an immigrant too. So is my wife. So was my mother. This country thrives and grows because of immigrants, not despite them. The way to help the heartlands is not to exclude talent from the US or make the perfect the enemy of the good. I grew up in NYC whose heartbeat is immigrants? The cheaper access is a total canard. I’ve hired over 300 immigrants in my career and ALL of them were paid identically to those who weren’t. The only people ever paid less were those who COULDN’T immigrate here (they couldn’t get visas) and had to stay in Hungary. Every high-tech company will pay talent fairly in order to keep it and keep them motivated. In 25 years and in building products used by a billion people I’ve never seen an exception to this.

    Disappointed
    Adam Bosworth

  35. Frankly, I think life would be easier with open borders and no guns outside of well regulated government militias.

    I have read that FWD.US is also doling out funds to other organizations that support “job-growth” via the Keystone XL pipeline and ANWR drilling. This is the whole problem with PACs and corporations as opposed to individual voting eligible citizens exercising political speech. The more “management” entities involved the screwier the results.

    Has FWD.US really ring-fenced its money around one idea or are these super Pacs trading mooney for influence with other groups. There s a smell about it if the story on ThinkProgress yesterday is true.

    ktgOakland

  36. The Zuckerberg Sandburg palling around with Lindsey Graham and Condi Rice – embracing two infamous NeoCons is very scary indeed.

    The problem is throwing an almost limitless amount of money hijacking our political process is exactly what is wrong with our politics right now.

    And this new PAC is not helping any.

  37. Good luck if you were born in America and try to get a novel idea to market. Funding agencies and venture firms are brainwashed that foreigners have better ideas and are more “innovative”. This is not the funders’ fault. It is our media and government who press these ideas into the fabric of our existence. For example, there are plenty of US born PhDs in biomedical science who cannot find work because the government doubled NIH biomedical grant funding, then there was an immediate shortage of workers, increased H1B visa biomedical workers were imported, they were allowed to stay and started their own labs then these researchers imported more foreign workers even though there is enough in the U.S. The last point takes place because the lab head is more comfortable working with people from his/her country. Meanwhile this exponential growth in funding ceased. It is a battle to find work if you are U.S. born and a biomedical PhD. It is even more of a battle to get a biomedical discovery funded. Now U.S. born biomedical PhDs must find work in patent law or venture capital or grant/science writing. Alternatively, we could move to China where U.S. pharma is building multi-million dollar research facilities. Oh, wait, China probably does not allow immigration of U.S. born PhDs!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.