My Big RSS-Ads Snafu

28 thoughts on “My Big RSS-Ads Snafu”

  1. Om, I was going to send you a screenshot of all of those Citibank banners in the GigaOm feed to see what you thought of the new look. πŸ™‚ I’ll be looking forward to how you work through the monitization details. Thanks for pulling those nasty banners. Cheers! btw, enjoyed your conversation with Gillmor the other day.

  2. I think the idea of only putting ads in posts that are over 400 words isn’t all that bad of an idea. It allows the blogger to be compensated for when the write up posts that require a sizable amount of time and effort.

    Including ads to every post might not be the best solution as they are obnoxious when included with really short posts, but for the longer ones it might just be worth it. Let us know how things turn out! πŸ™‚

  3. I think its a bad idea to have ads in ur RSS feeds! I anyway come to the site if its good article or post and I feel I can’t finish reading it when I was in the ‘browsing’ mode! These RSS ads just add up to irritation while browsing … keep the content up => the gigaads will definitely have a good premium I think πŸ˜€

  4. It’s OK, I needed a new Citibank card anyway! πŸ™‚ Seriously, ad saturation in RSS is touchy subject and there’s no “right answer” now. Actually, perhaps there is: asking your audience what they’re willing to accept is probably the best possible answer you can get Om, so kudos for that. Personally, I have to read through so many feeds these days that my eyes are almost trained to ignore ads. The 400 word cutoff is a good compromise to compensate you for your effort while retaining plenty of quality, ad-free shorter posts for the readers. Now, we start seeing bunches of 401 word posts, we might feel differently! πŸ˜‰

  5. Personally, I feel that if people are not willing to help out with costs by tossing a little money your way, say via paypal, then they have no right to complain about advertisements.

    Sure, some may view one advertisement per post (in feed) as a bit much – the coming standard seems to be one per day, plus one for any post over x00 words – but I don’t think it’s too bad, so long as the ads are not intrusive, flashy, blinky, or annoying. A simple advertisement at the bottom of the post? No worries.

  6. Of course, I like it when there are no ads in RSS feeds, but I’m mostly ok when there are. The adsense or any other “text” ads are the least annoying though.

    With your feed, I was more annoyed today because it was the same ad over and over again more than anything else.

  7. Ads are fine if they allow me to keep reading your great blog through my RSS Feed.

    I prefer an AD to SkypeJournal choice of ONLY showing the headline.

    We all have to eat no?

    Bring on the ads. (I can always ignore them πŸ˜‰

  8. I believe the people who reads RSS can pretty much ignore all ads inflicked upon them, text or flashy. For your sake, I hope I am (along with my 400+ feeds on Bloglines) a minority.

  9. I believe it is more than fair to get some compensation for yur work. Ads do not bother me if they are in line with the general content(or audience) of the blog.

  10. Please leave the ads on the web – i like RSS because I see what I want to see and I don’t see what I don’t want to see (spam). I have no use for my RSS reader if I have to see the junk I see on websites as well.

  11. After reading other peoples thoughts I change my mind – I agree that ads would not be too bad as long as:

    1. they contain no flash (I really hate those – very distracting when they keep looping)
    2. They are not in the middle of the post, but kept to the left or right of the entry (same for your website by the way)
    3. They are not too wide such that I have to scroll forever to read the entry (ie, it does not take up 50-75%+ of the width)
    4. You don’t send them in adds that would be of small value to the reader

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.